Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

N00b question... How fast could this spin...and work?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    no 60 degree will rev that high and stay togethor.

    I just got done saying even the highly modified race motors that were only built to last 2 hours didnt' spin that high, and they used ALL FORGED BOTTOM END with 4 bolt caps!!!

    nip this shit in teh bud already.

    Comment


    • #17
      "no 60 degree will rev that high and stay togethor. "

      Did you ignore that the 3.6 VVT built by GM for racing goes past 10k? Sure, its twin turbo but its a 60V6.
      Ben
      60DegreeV6.com
      WOT-Tech.com

      Comment


      • #18
        I stand corrected. NO 60 degree that we could afford can go that high.

        Maybe the VVt can doit with high dollar parts. NOone here is going to do it.

        people are going to use the older stuff as its cheaper and well thats why it wont'spin that high.

        Keep it to a max of 8k and be happy. But even then I wouldnt'go that high very often.

        Keep it under 7500 for long life.

        I just dont' understand the fascination

        Comment


        • #19
          The VVt racing motor is made from stock castings and forgings. Any more words of wisdom?

          Although a small liner was pressed into the block to meet the class rules of a 3.5L engine, the block casting, cylinder head castings, and crankshaft all remained production components.
          No reason us humble folks cant afford a motor made from stock stuff. The motor mentioned above makes OVER 1650 HP.
          1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
          1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
          Because... I am, CANADIAN

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by betterthanyou
            The VVt racing motor is made from stock castings and forgings. Any more words of wisdom?

            Although a small liner was pressed into the block to meet the class rules of a 3.5L engine, the block casting, cylinder head castings, and crankshaft all remained production components.
            No reason us humble folks cant afford a motor made from stock stuff. The motor mentioned above makes OVER 1650 HP.
            QFTMFT!!!

            I'm sure that I will find my engine buzzing that high one day, why? because I can and it will make for a quicker pass down the 1320.

            I also know of a few SBC/BBCs that spin higher than 10000 RPM, and stay together.

            Also don't make generalizations of all of us on this forum, because you can't afford to make a high reving 660, I may not be able to afford it, but I will find ways to do it.

            Comment


            • #21
              I have a chevy 350 that shifts at 9500 but that is a very expensive bottom end.
              95 Beretta Z-26
              Don't need nitrous to go fast.
              Global peace through deadly force!

              Comment


              • #22
                Keep in mind a Small Block has a longer stroke. That plays a HUGE part in RPM developement.

                A short 2.8L stroke will reduce piston speed quite drasticaly and allow for much more RPM with a component of comparable strength.

                So your very expensive bottom end can spin at 9500 with a 3.48" stroke. If the same expense (maybe even less) was invested in a 2.8L 2.99" crank then another 500 RPM could easily be had.

                I still agree with everyone that a venture like this will cost a good chunk of change.

                But the original question asked if it could be done and would it work

                My answer is YES!
                1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                Because... I am, CANADIAN

                Comment


                • #23
                  i say givver, but umm, id make sure its ballenced and u spent some change on it, i lost one my 85 2.8L roadracing it was aproching 9-5Gs it was pretty much stock besides a mean ignition
                  VIDEO Acadian http://videos.streetfire.net/video/8...7f00197eea.htm
                  VIDEO Chevette http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...500156e11b.htm


                  Six-t-Six Motorsports
                  2.8L Chevette Roadcar
                  3.2L Acadian Racecar

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by betterthanyou
                    Originally posted by sharkey
                    a good example of this would be top alsohol funny car. most guys were shifting at 9500rpm max a couple years ago. then in order to get the breakage down, the rules changed and dropped the blower overdrive, and it knocked the cars down a good 2 tenths. to combat this, racers changed everything in the car, gearing, clutches, even chaged to a short stroke big borew motor, all so they could rev it to 10,500rpm to get the blower boost back were it used to be.
                    No man we fucking never run our engine that high. Not even close. If we hit the rev limiter at about 9500 then we toss all the springs. Under 8500 RPM is our operating range.
                    we shifted at 9500, went through the top end about 9700. the top guys now shift at 10,500rpm to run 5.50s in a funny car. they have gone from the traditional 4.310 bore/4.5" stroke to a 4.5" bore/4.300 stroke to get the higher rpm. more rpm, spins the blower faster, gets more boost, makes more power. lower budget teams dont attempt this. 3 runs on a set of steel valve springs, 8 runs on a set of titanium springs before they are junk. this rpm eats parts, but it makes ya go fast.

                    with an alcohol dragster, to run a 5.40 they are shifting at 10,500rpm with a 452" motor. to run 5.30, shifting at 11,000rpm.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      This 10K rpm engine will be useless until someone finds a transmisison that can handle an input shaft speed that high and actually work. Wasn't Curtis having problems with his Getrag shifting any higher than 8000? The RWD guys have more options, but not cheap.

                      Marty
                      '99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
                      '98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
                      '84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
                      '88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now

                      Quote of the week:
                      Originally posted by Aaron
                      This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by RacerX11
                        This 10K rpm engine will be useless until someone finds a transmisison that can handle an input shaft speed that high and actually work. Wasn't Curtis having problems with his Getrag shifting any higher than 8000? The RWD guys have more options, but not cheap.

                        Marty
                        Good point, but not much of a concern when you're bulding a 10K RPM plus engine, usually a tranny isn't much of a concern, meaning that it's part of the package.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by RacerX11
                          This 10K rpm engine will be useless until someone finds a transmisison that can handle an input shaft speed that high and actually work. Wasn't Curtis having problems with his Getrag shifting any higher than 8000? The RWD guys have more options, but not cheap.

                          Marty
                          Yes, The trans wouldn't shift properly past 6800-7200 rpm range and up.
                          I've felt it myself.. And this was with 2 different transmissions, He just blew up trans #2 just a few weeks ago racing the car.... Sigh. I was behind his car in the staging lanes (racing Steve's turbo wagon for him) and watched it do a small hop.... then nothing.

                          For the 3t40 style transmissions, you cannot spin them any faster than 6500rpm IIRC due to the pump's not being able to handle that type of speed.
                          The rest of the GM FWD auto's I'm not sure what the limiting rpm is now on them either.
                          Colin
                          92 Sunbird GT, 3200 Hybrid 13.99@ 95.22 (2004)
                          90 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 10.54 @ 129mph.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I wonder if Curtis is having a problem with the syncros simply frying themselves from the high RPM. Syncros of a different material and a different fluid viscosity may be of some help.

                            If bearings are going then a piece of more precice construction and a different fluid viscosity may be needed.
                            1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                            1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                            Because... I am, CANADIAN

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I'm just glad I know my tranny can built to run speeds that high, or I'll just switch to one that does.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by betterthanyou
                                I wonder if Curtis is having a problem with the syncros simply frying themselves from the high RPM. Syncros of a different material and a different fluid viscosity may be of some help.

                                If bearings are going then a piece of more precice construction and a different fluid viscosity may be needed.
                                I think its more of an issue with the Speed at which the trans is spinning, The centrifical forces on the synchro/synchro slider and dog's are not what the stock tran's was intended to spin at and shift.

                                Also think the case is twisting and warping under such loads which is why its so hard to shift in the lower gear due to the torque, IF the case is flexing under the load would explain the hard shift feel as it doesn't take much to cause a shift rail to bind.

                                $$ could fix his issues, And these problems can be sorted out, But he's not interested and say's he's just going to street drive the car from now on I guess.
                                Colin
                                92 Sunbird GT, 3200 Hybrid 13.99@ 95.22 (2004)
                                90 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 10.54 @ 129mph.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X