Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

punching the 3.4 to a 4.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • punching the 3.4 to a 4.0

    I run a 3.4 out of a 96 camero in my class 7s desert race truck , we are limited to 4.0 lt. the 4.3 is not allowed , some sancioned bodys allow it but it must be stock , I want to know if anybody has taken the 3.4 up to a 4.0 through bore and stroke , I race against ford rangers the are all running the new sohc 4.0 i'm having a hell of a time keeping up with them ,i'm a very loyal to chevy , even though I race in a sport dominated by fords

  • #2
    Use a 3900 with a cable driven throttle body and tuned. The 3.4 is not going to be made into a 4.0 without custom everything and is not worth trying to do with the 3900 already made.

    I thought the 96 camaro only came with a 3.8.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

    Comment


    • #3
      does the 3900 have the same bell housing bolt pattern as the 3.4
      Last edited by milestonemotorsports; 07-19-2011, 08:47 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes it does. You should read up on it though as its not the easiest thing to use. The stock crank trigger won't work with older computer but a standalone unit might hook right up, even with the VVT. Drive by wire sucks though so I would use a cable instead.
        Ben
        60DegreeV6.com
        WOT-Tech.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by milestonemotorsports View Post
          does the 3900 have the same bell housing bolt pattern as the 3.4
          Yes.

          Edit: Ninja'd by Ben...
          -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
          91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
          92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed (getting there, slowly... follow the progress here)
          94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
          Originally posted by Jay Leno
          Tires are cheap clutches...

          Comment


          • #6
            Yeah, the 4.3 probably wouldn't work easily anyway because it is based on a 90 degree block iirc, and making a 4.0 out of a 3400 would be extremely difficult and expensive, if not impossible. It would be much easier to start off with a 3900. You know the block will already be big enough and you don't have to do anything to it internally if you don't want, or you could just over bore it to 4.0 L.
            '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
            '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
            13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
            Gotta love boost!

            Comment


            • #7
              How about the 3.6 drive train from a new camaro? 306hp wasnt it?

              Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bob442 View Post
                How about the 3.6 drive train from a new camaro? 306hp wasnt it?
                I have to start with a motor that is offerd as an option in a s-10 or colorado

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by milestonemotorsports View Post
                  I have to start with a motor that is offerd as an option in a s-10 or colorado
                  How are they letting you run the 3.4L then, as it was never an option in the S-10? Anyway, if we ignore that fact, is there any restriction to what you can do to the engine? If it was me, I would keep the 3.4 (maybe bore it out .040 to bump up the displacement some), then go with the newer aluminum heads and top end. And then tune it. But again, that's if the rules allow it...
                  -Brad-
                  89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                  sigpic
                  Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    3500 top end and a good cam on that 3.4 and those ford boys will see your tail lights


                    if you can sneak it in there swap in a whole 3500, throw in a cam and some headers. With the RWD accessories/timing cover hardly anybody would know the difference.
                    Past Builds;
                    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                    Current Project;
                    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What about a de-stroked 4.3L? I know we all like 660's here but if they are only going to let you run the stock iron heads then the Vortec 4.3L wins over the stock Gen I 660 heads all day long. If head swaps are allowed the a tuned 3400 3500 or 3900 would be a killer combo.
                      1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                      1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                      Because... I am, CANADIAN

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by bszopi View Post
                        How are they letting you run the 3.4L then, as it was never an option in the S-10? Anyway, if we ignore that fact, is there any restriction to what you can do to the engine? If it was me, I would keep the 3.4 (maybe bore it out .040 to bump up the displacement some), then go with the newer aluminum heads and top end. And then tune it. But again, that's if the rules allow it...
                        The 3.4 is a stock replacement made by gm performance fo the S-10 , I am thinking something along that line , Im thinking using the 3.1 aluminum heads . and making a custum intake out of a intake plenum to use a carb I have to use a TBI or carb.
                        Last edited by milestonemotorsports; 07-21-2011, 01:30 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by betterthanyou View Post
                          What about a de-stroked 4.3L? I know we all like 660's here but if they are only going to let you run the stock iron heads then the Vortec 4.3L wins over the stock Gen I 660 heads all day long. If head swaps are allowed the a tuned 3400 3500 or 3900 would be a killer combo.
                          SCORE off-road racing doesnt allow the 4.3 and the sancion body that do allow the 4.3 say it has to be bone stock , headers only , im also concerned of the extra wieght of the 4.3

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by milestonemotorsports View Post
                            The 3.4 is a stock replacement made by gm performance fo the S-10 , I am thinking something along that line , Im thinking using the 3.1 aluminum heads . and making a custum intake out of a intake plenum to use a carb I have to use a TBI or carb.
                            Ok, yeah it is, just wasn't sure if that was part of the rules, as the Camaro 3.4 and the crate 3.4 are slightly different. Anyways...

                            As far as the intake goes, I was thinking about this the other night, but held back saying anything just yet. I'd have to sketch it up, but I'd think the best way to go about this would be keep the alum head lower intake, and then make a custom upper out of exhaust tubing and sheet metal. 1.5" dia. exhaust tubing is the proper size IIRC for the ports. Cut up some u-bends to merge to a box in the middle where the carb would set. Should have plenty of clearance in an S-10 engine bay for this. Just an idea!

                            Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using Tapatalk
                            -Brad-
                            89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                            sigpic
                            Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If you can weld aluminum, you could probably cut a hole in the top of a 3x00 upper intake, and weld on a carb spacer as your base. You could chop off the throttle body neck and weld it shut, or just install a block-off plate.

                              Might be easier than building an intake manifold from scratch.

                              Just an idea...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X