Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Halfing throttle shafts, worthless or not?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Halfing throttle shafts, worthless or not?

    I'm sure you've all seen ported or performance TB's that have the front half of the shaft cut off so all you see is the 2 screws. This supposedly would let more air by. Looking at it you think it might be a good increase in area.

    But what do you all think? Does it do anything to increase flow? Or is it a waste of time?

    Is it a possible reliability issue?
    sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
    1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
    16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
    Original L82 Longblock
    with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
    Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.


  • #2
    I don't what that does to the path of flow. Its like an airplane wing if you cut half of it off.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

    Comment


    • #3
      I think it would weaken theshaft too much for me to want to do it.
      White '89 Beretta GTU with a 3400 under the hood. only a tranzgenic CAI so far!

      Comment


      • #4
        I read on gm high tech performance they put on a TB that was halved and knife edged and plugged up some holes for the IAC that might cause turbulence and they got 11 peak hp, but that's on a big high hp V8. And the peak was up very high in RPMs.

        Maybe on a 3100 you'll get .25hp ? 1? It does look like it would let more air by.

        I don't know about turbulence affecting it.

        I do see a lot of the performance TB's being offered as doing this but I wonder if it makes a difference or is just to make it look better like you're getting something really cool....
        sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
        1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
        16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
        Original L82 Longblock
        with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
        Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

        Comment


        • #5
          Some sanctioning bodies limit throttle bodies to a certain size. In this case where you must extract every last ounce of airflow out of the limited throttle body size you might cut the shaft down to get what you can. Otherwise it is mostly a waste of time. Unless you have allot of extra time and you are looking for a make work project.
          1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
          1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
          Because... I am, CANADIAN

          Comment


          • #6
            Hmm well what if you're on a budget and need greater than 56mm of TB, but can't afford anything else.....

            Cutting the shaft would be quick with a Dremel.

            I wonder if halving the shaft would gain you the equivalent of 1mm more diameter or something?
            sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
            1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
            16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
            Original L82 Longblock
            with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
            Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

            Comment


            • #7
              I think I posted flow differences at the intake valve with a 56 and 65mm TB using a ported manifold set and mild porting on the 3500. I don't have any way of flowing just the TB, since that is more CFM than my setup is for.
              Ben
              60DegreeV6.com
              WOT-Tech.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by IsaacHayes View Post

                I wonder if halving the shaft would gain you the equivalent of 1mm more diameter or something?
                You would have to formulate...

                Let's say we have a 54mm TB.

                circumferance=diameter*3.14
                area=3.14*radius*radius

                54mm*1mm=54mm new clearance by removing 1/2 the throttle shaft...

                area=27mm*27mm*3.14=2289.06mm of area + the 54mm from the shaft removal...2343.06mm^2
                You would recieve a 2% increase in area (little over 1mm in total area, not circumference).


                The ammount of work it would take would be justifiable as replacing the throttle plate with a larger one, or getting a bigger TB.

                AND as Ben said, what would it do with the turbulance that could potentially cause vacuum pockets where you didn't want them?
                Links:
                WOT-Tech.com
                FaceBook
                Instagram

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by scrappy View Post
                  I think it would weaken theshaft too much for me to want to do it.
                  i did mine probably 4 years and 60,000 miles ago with no problems

                  Originally posted by betterthanyou View Post
                  Unless you have allot of extra time and you are looking for a make work project.
                  thats why i did mine
                  3.4L camaro some goodies

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hmm I need to measure the thickness of the protruding of the shaft and then calculate it.

                    Getting a 2nd TB for the shaft to play with and then comparing them (butt dyno only though) might be something I will do in the future... I don't think any 3400 TBs had the "C" type linkage on them. If I had a spare one I'd mess with it for fun.

                    I could measure before and after and calculate area... Take the front off, get some flat screws, thin the back side shaft down, cut the protruding screw threads off...

                    Replacing the throttle plate or getting a different TB would equal lots of money. :P A dremel and 45mins of time would probably be all it would take me.

                    The way I calculated I subtracted from the overall area the shaft area before and after modded then compared. Would it be accurate to convert that area back to diameter? Then you could compare that to a larger diameter TB....
                    sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
                    1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
                    16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
                    Original L82 Longblock
                    with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
                    Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ehhh, waste of time. do some gasket matching.
                      Andy

                      sigpic

                      fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
                      fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

                      62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        All the TBs I used to sell had half the shaft removed where the plate bolts on.
                        Theoretically, you're gaining 3-4mm at WOT. I've seen absolutely no reliability issues that come from removing half the shaft.

                        I've also done this on stock TBs. Again, no disadvantage to it that I've seen.
                        You could likely even remove the shaft from the TB while still in the car, but the angle of the TB on some cars would make it a pain.
                        Time to do this would only be 30 min to an hour.
                        Franz

                        1990 Z24-NA 3.1L
                        14.72 @ 92.24 MPH
                        14.89 @ 94.92 MPH

                        The boost is coming....

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I've already got gasket matched stuff. Just need the most cfm from my 56mm TB as possible as I'm too poor to get the billet 65mm unit.

                          I may go ahead and do it some day. Hopefully there won't be turbulence issues, and the neck extends so far down the 3500 plenum hopefully that wouldn't matter by the time it opens up.

                          Taking off the TB without that coolant pipe mount will be a quick task. If/when I do it I will measure the half shaft and post numbers and such.
                          sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
                          1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
                          16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
                          Original L82 Longblock
                          with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
                          Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by IsaacHayes View Post
                            I've already got gasket matched stuff. Just need the most cfm from my 56mm TB as possible as I'm too poor to get the billet 65mm unit.

                            I hear ya there man! Some say it works, others don't notice anything. I say what the hell. Can't hurt.-shrug- Maybe it's more for a stock TB instead of the bigger ones.

                            Hey Franz! It's nice that every once in a while you let us know you are still breathing out there! :P
                            Andy

                            sigpic

                            fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
                            fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

                            62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X