Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Need HP on a 3.1 FWD..!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DirtRacer View Post
    I think i'm now gonna build 2 versions. One for the CAV. and the other one for the spare car (beretta Gt ..)

    First one will get the new cam (440lift) with the 1.6 roller rocker. Ported heads (if i can finally get in touch with SHAUN...) Ported UIM and LIM. also put 3400 exhaust man. Everything with the GEN2 stuff.. (Also have the ligntweight crank pulley, chip and 180 F thermostat.). Maybe a lightweight flywheel if i found one, as a bored TB.

    For the 2nd, i really like the idea from Super Dave (I think..)3400, with 2.8 RWD piston and ported everything GEN2 Stuff. Maybe the 2.8 crank too... But we really need the extra punch in exit of the turn from the 3.1 crank.
    For this one, we will continue to look at some extra mod...

    thanks
    you'd need a 3100 to do the 2.8 piston swap "2800" the 3.1 and 2.8 share the same bore but the 2.8 has a slightly shorter stroke.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment


    • #17
      3400 block, 2.8 crank, whichever rods work(help me out here Dave lol) and 3.4L RWD pistons. oh and race gas for that high compression IIRC that will still leave you at around 3.1L for displacement, but it'll liek to rev high

      Cammed 3400 --> 224whp 210wtq
      Cammed 3500 --> ???
      1 of 5 3500 J-Bodies

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by RedBird View Post
        3400 block, 2.8 crank, whichever rods work(help me out here Dave lol) and 3.4L RWD pistons. oh and race gas for that high compression IIRC that will still leave you at around 3.1L for displacement, but it'll liek to rev high
        lol.. you'd probably need custom pistons to get any kind of respectable compression. When spring rolls around we should go junkyarding and collect up a bunch of random stuff..
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment


        • #19
          i thought that 3.4 RWD pistons gave you crazy compression, like 12.5:1? hell i remember you saying it before......

          Cammed 3400 --> 224whp 210wtq
          Cammed 3500 --> ???
          1 of 5 3500 J-Bodies

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by RedBird View Post
            i thought that 3.4 RWD pistons gave you crazy compression, like 12.5:1? hell i remember you saying it before......
            right, but the 2.8 crank drops the piston in the cyl like 8mm so you need a taller piston to make up for that difference.
            Past Builds;
            1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
            1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
            Current Project;
            1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Tdunk View Post
              define old better..... if he got a 3100 with alot of miles then how would they know the real difference? The 3100's still have a 3100 on the UIM and he could just ask ben to have a 3100 UIM without the SFI on it. If he wants it to look old then get an engine with plenty of miles on it and clean the interior of the engine up a bit to free up any HP losses from the age.... I dont see any problem with this? Srry about rwd i mis intrepreted what he origionally wanted.
              it doesn't work like that, they're not looking for an "oily", high mileage engine, they're looking for one that looks period correct and if you know anything at all about gm over the past 10 years its not hard to tell that a newer 3x00 plenum is not period correct for his car

              Comment

              Working...
              X