Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GM Orange Antifreeze Lawsuit Settlement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GM Orange Antifreeze Lawsuit Settlement

    How long have you waited to hear this???

    Lawsuit Details

    The Settlement will reimburse Dexcool repairs ranging from $50 to $800.

    Who qualifies? Owners of many 1995 - 2004 Chevy, Buick, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, or GMC vehicles that needed gasket or sludge repairs. However, the repair must have been done within the first 7 years or 150,000 miles. And you will need your reciepts.


    Full Story at this link


    http://www.wcpo.com/content/news/loc...e-265615df3a9e

  • #2
    Full detailt here

    http://www.girardgibbs.com/dexcool.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Link to the form to file your claim.
      To make a claim in the class action settlement in the above case, please complete
      and mail this form, postmarked no later than October 27, 2008, to:
      Dex Cool Litigation
      c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.
      P.O. Box 9239
      Dublin, OH 43017-4639


      http://www.girardgibbs.com/dexclaimform.pdf

      Comment


      • #4
        So if your covered up to 2004 what happened after 2004? Did they re formulate? I don't think GM changed anything because the cars they used them in still have the same engine. The 4.3L for example has been un touched in design since 1996 and it is still used today. It was one of the worst engines for sludge buildup but did not suffer from intake gasket problems like the 3X00 motors.
        1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
        1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
        Because... I am, CANADIAN

        Comment


        • #5
          Newer gasket style in 04... not sure if that solved all the issues tho...

          Got Lope?
          3500 Build, Comp XFI Cam 218/230 .050 dur .570/.568 lift 113LSA
          Fully Balanced, Ported, 3 Angle Valve Job, 65mm TCE TB, S&S Headers.
          Stage-1 Raybestos/Alto 4t60e-HD, EP LSD, 3.69FDR
          12.61@105 Epping NH Oct 2015 Nitrous 100shot (melted plugs) 13.58@98.8 N/A 3200LBS

          Comment


          • #6
            all they did was add the metal tabs so the guy putting it on wouldnt crush the shit out of the gasket but its still a plastic gasket which will fatigue over time.

            my lst one with the metal tabs lasted a whole whopping 10k miles before it went south and took the engine with it. and that was with generous amounts of loc-tite.
            sigpic
            99 Grand Am GT
            3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
            Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
            1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur
            515 515 lift 112 lsa
            15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come


            Comment


            • #7
              dex-cool is satan i think GM invented it just to make the gaskets go.
              92 LeBaron Convert: Does it run yet? 03 Silverado 2500HD ecsb 4x4 6.0L: dual 3" in/out race "muffler" 2005 Ford Taurus SE 3.0: DD from california

              Comment


              • #8
                GM didn't make it. Texaco did.
                1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                Because... I am, CANADIAN

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by betterthanyou View Post
                  So if your covered up to 2004 what happened after 2004? Did they re formulate? I don't think GM changed anything because the cars they used them in still have the same engine. The 4.3L for example has been un touched in design since 1996 and it is still used today. It was one of the worst engines for sludge buildup but did not suffer from intake gasket problems like the 3X00 motors.

                  I've got the 4.3L in my 2002 S-10, so I try and keep up with it. From what I've been reading, they are suffering the same gasket issue, maybe just not as often. Mostly in the late ninetees models I think.

                  On a side note, the latest thing I've read about the 4.3 is having issues with the cfsi poppet fuel nozzles clogging up in the spider assembly. They have this complicated fuel system cleaning bulletin out, or you can buy a newer replacement mfi part.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by betterthanyou View Post
                    GM didn't make it. Texaco did.
                    thats what they want you to think
                    92 LeBaron Convert: Does it run yet? 03 Silverado 2500HD ecsb 4x4 6.0L: dual 3" in/out race "muffler" 2005 Ford Taurus SE 3.0: DD from california

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by talon2swords View Post
                      I've got the 4.3L in my 2002 S-10, so I try and keep up with it. From what I've been reading, they are suffering the same gasket issue, maybe just not as often. Mostly in the late ninetees models I think.

                      On a side note, the latest thing I've read about the 4.3 is having issues with the cfsi poppet fuel nozzles clogging up in the spider assembly. They have this complicated fuel system cleaning bulletin out, or you can buy a newer replacement mfi part.
                      You mean this bulliten http://members.shaw.ca/betterthanyou...g%20Poppet.htm
                      There are revised injectors but the later trucks already have them. There is no true MPFI replacement with fuel rails and injectors.
                      1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                      1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                      Because... I am, CANADIAN

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by talon2swords View Post
                        I've got the 4.3L in my 2002 S-10, so I try and keep up with it. From what I've been reading, they are suffering the same gasket issue, maybe just not as often. Mostly in the late ninetees models I think.

                        On a side note, the latest thing I've read about the 4.3 is having issues with the cfsi poppet fuel nozzles clogging up in the spider assembly. They have this complicated fuel system cleaning bulletin out, or you can buy a newer replacement mfi part.
                        The gaskets fail exactly the same on 4.3, but these intakes have a lot, i mean a lot less torque on them than the 3x00. If you ever do replace the LIM gaskets on the 4.3, don't spray any sort of parts cleaner IE brake clean, carb spray, etc into UIM. It messes up the poppet valves and you have to end up replacing the entire unit with the new system, which is a lot better. Also, follow the torque procedure exactly, if you don't it screws up the crank bearings (i know, it sounds impossible but it does.) Most people blame it on the coolant eating the bearings, but there are bulletins explaining that when you don't follow the procedure it causes bearing failure from shifting of the block.

                        If you really want keep up on your S-10, take the vacuum booster hose out of the UIM and look inside with a flashlight, if it's clean that means your fpr is leaking, and then again, i'm pretty sure you have to replace the entire system since it's part of the "spider".

                        Back on to topic.. I don't know why you guys hate dexcool so much... Yeah, our LIM fail, but you're blaming it on the coolant? Yes, it "sludges", but that's what it was designed to do, not to clog ports, but to put a coating over all the aluminum parts so they wouldn't corrode. As long as you flush out your system every 30kish, you'll be fine... I've opened up 3100s that used dexcool, and used green. The ones that used green the LIM was corroding away so the gasket had nothing to seal against. The ones with dex, the gaskets cracked. The other reason they use dexcool because it doesn't let current pass through it (at least that's what they tried to tell us at a training). But don't get mad, that's just my opinion on dexcool, like everyone has their opinion. I like it, because i've seen corrosion on SBC aluminum intakes that builds up when you use green (and never change it). I've seen the sludge from the dex, but it was a lot cheaper to throw the sludged parts in the parts washer than it was to replace the aluminum intakes.
                        You may or may not know 10 times what i do.
                        ASE Master certified. Just means I can take tests. GM ASEP Graduate.
                        95' Z26, ported/cammed 3400/3500, OBD2, 282, T3T4. Boxes almost all empty..

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X