Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

95 camaro 3.4, mega sqirt and exaust: how much HP

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 95 camaro 3.4, mega sqirt and exaust: how much HP

    im thinking about putting MS, headers and intake on my 95 camaro bacause there top end swap friendly parts for when ever im ready to do that. what kind of gains do you think i could get from the intake, headers, and MS tune?

  • #2
    what kind of intake?

    MS would be ideal since I'm assuming you have a 94 un-tuneable 3.4l. Then you can put headers on, and a 3x00 top end (3400 top end, or 3500 top end, 3400 plenum to clear cowl)

    MS would let you get all the HP out of any mods you do since you can tune. And if you do go gen3 (3x00) top end you won't need as much spark advance as the old iron heads did so being able to tune is great.

    If you want to make power having MS allows you to do any mod you want and get full benefit from it.
    sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
    1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
    16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
    Original L82 Longblock
    with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
    Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

    Comment


    • #3
      What intake? I'm just going to search eBay for something real cheep that will get rid of all the ribed rubber crap with a cone on the end.

      How do I know if I have the un tuneabull 3.4l? I never thought of that, I assumed there all un tuneabull. Is there a tuneabull 3.4l? I think I have a 95, but it might be a 94 model. I have to look up the titel or something, but if my car is tuneabul would I be better off with MS anyway?

      And I would be getting the ms to support future mods but I'm still curious what you guys think I would be seeing power wize with the stock motor with exaust and intake.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm a fan of Isaac hayes too, he was bad ass as hell in pulp fiction and escape from new york, but I got freaked out bacause you see his bare ass bent over in I now pronounce you chuck and Larry

        Comment


        • #5
          Oh CAI. Got ya. Keep the filter out of the engine bay hot air.

          93 still had OBDI with a removable prom that you could burn a chip for. 94-95 just like the FWD cars have a flash based ECM that no one supports. Is your car an automatic? That will be a problem if so going with MS as the ECM controls the trans. You should be able to piggy back the two though. If you are a 93 then you could just get an emulator or burn chips and tune away with the stock ECM.

          Good long tube headers, and a good tune and exhaust, 20+ crank HP possibly?? Just guessing.

          My real name is Isaac Hayes. And that was Ving Rhames in Pulp Fiction and in Chuck and Larry.
          sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
          1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
          16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
          Original L82 Longblock
          with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
          Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

          Comment


          • #6
            O cool, 20 isnt bad. I IMDB'ed it your right,Ving Rhames: marcellis wallis and Isaac hays: duke of new york, IDK how i mexed them up lol

            Comment


            • #7
              Don't quote me on 20hp, but good designed headers should free up a lot of power, and if you can tune for it then you'll get every bit of it. Stock motors can benefit from tunes too, just by fine tuning.
              sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
              1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
              16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
              Original L82 Longblock
              with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
              Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

              Comment


              • #8
                The only headers I can find for my car are pase setters.are they any good? And think the intake could give me another 5? I'm gonna polish the TB also.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Depending on how GM tuned that, you might pick up 20HP from the tune alone. I know that's been done before.
                  \"NASCAR is an integral part of my life. A part of me died when Dale Earnhardt died.\"

                  1997 Olds CS 4-door S/C - 183,527 miles
                  1999 Chevrolet Lumina 3100 - Wife took it at 158,340 miles
                  1989 Volvo 740GL Wagon 2.3 8v - 232,050 miles

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DEI37 View Post
                    Depending on how GM tuned that, you might pick up 20HP from the tune alone. I know that's been done before.
                    10-20 from tune, 3-5 from headers, and 3-5 from intake, 3-5 from TB P&P? am i looking at ~17-35 to the crank, ~13-23 to the wheeles? what about torqe?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by niik000 View Post
                      10-20 from tune, 3-5 from headers, and 3-5 from intake, 3-5 from TB P&P? am i looking at ~17-35 to the crank, ~13-23 to the wheeles? what about torqe?
                      Id say more around 10 from a tune, 20 from headers, 3 or less from an intake, and 3 or less for the TB.
                      2006 AWD TBSS 12.538 @ 106.92 1.66 60' Bolt-ons only

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by silvergtjrad View Post
                        20 from headers
                        alone? or did you mean 2?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i am running pacesetters on my 93 firebird 3.4 and i love them. they give the car a real nice sound. but i dont know how much hp they will give you but i know there is a seat of the pants feel diff with the pacesetters over stock.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I meant 20, not 2
                            2006 AWD TBSS 12.538 @ 106.92 1.66 60' Bolt-ons only

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              20 ft Lbs or 20 hp?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X