I downloaded the demo version of GMPCM a couple days before the site went down (lucky me) but I didn't get a chance to take in all that the forum had to offer. Now I'm trying to match up my work from the GMPCM demo to TunerPro.
I've noticed that GMPCM's A1.PCM and the A1.XDF definition for TunerPro have some different conversion rates for some of the values. Unfortunately, I can't decipher which is right and which is wrong, so which one should I take as the correct one? AFAIK the $A1 supplied by GMPCM is closer, but I want to make sure.
Example:
Idle Spark Advance Table
A1.PCM uses a conversion factor of (1 * X) + 0.0
A1.XDF uses a conversion factor of (0.351563 * X) + 0.0
Main Spark Advance Table
A1.PCM uses (0.351563 * X) - 3.52
A1.XDF uses (0.351563 * X) + 0.0
I've noticed that GMPCM's A1.PCM and the A1.XDF definition for TunerPro have some different conversion rates for some of the values. Unfortunately, I can't decipher which is right and which is wrong, so which one should I take as the correct one? AFAIK the $A1 supplied by GMPCM is closer, but I want to make sure.
Example:
Idle Spark Advance Table
A1.PCM uses a conversion factor of (1 * X) + 0.0
A1.XDF uses a conversion factor of (0.351563 * X) + 0.0
Main Spark Advance Table
A1.PCM uses (0.351563 * X) - 3.52
A1.XDF uses (0.351563 * X) + 0.0
Comment