Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

is a granatelli motorsports MAF sensor really worth it?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • is a granatelli motorsports MAF sensor really worth it?


  • #2
    That link doesn't lead to a part, just a search.



    Quite simply, answer is no. There a lot of other factors involved when changing MAF's and you need to be able to tune your computer to go with it. Otherwise you might run into problems. It's not as simple as throw a new MAF in and get some HP.
    '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
    '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
    13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
    Gotta love boost!

    Comment


    • #3
      thats what i figured, so it might help but without considering all factors, its $300 down the drain (which seems like a bit much for just a maf sensor?)?

      Comment


      • #4
        Depending on what engine you have, you can bump up to a 75mm MAF for a few bux. http://60degreev6.com/discussion/vie...&highlight=maf

        It works. You need it tuned though.
        If you are driving a Chevy, everything else, is just a blur. 3.4 Carbon Footprint.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          My Dad put one of those MAF's on his 03 Z06 and lost power. Also put one from JET on his 04 GAGT and it gave a code "too much air". He also has the 62mm TB from PFYC.com.
          Andy

          sigpic

          fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
          fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

          62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

          Comment


          • #6
            As Aaron mentioned, anytime you replace the MAF with a bigger one, you really need to make the appropriate changes in the PCM, otherwise, it will effect the performance. Most often in a bad way. There is a table within the PCM which tells how many grams of air is passing based on the frequency (Hz) response of the MAF. This helps the PCM to decide Cyl pressure for spark, and depending on the model of engine, quite a few other things.
            Regards,

            Todd E. Johnson

            Comment


            • #7
              Yeah, but supposedly they say the MAF has been calibrated for the car, so no need to tune. FYI, the vette already had the ECM tuned.
              Andy

              sigpic

              fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
              fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

              62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

              Comment


              • #8
                I had one on my 3100. I did'nt lose any power and it was calibrated to my car. I was able to open up my intake. I might still have it laying around here somewhere.
                I wish 10% of the people on the road knew how to drive

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have one, for a replacement if your MAS has gone bad, it's really not that bad for a replacement! I think. also I looked on a scanner and it does richen up the fuel mixture a little? how much I'm not sure. I got mine for under $200 and it works grate! I'm not sure of the Hp differences but I've seen a Camarro with an LS1 gain almost 8Hp on a dyno by installing one! so they have to do something!

                  Ps. I also have my intake work done!
                  2002 Pontiac GrandAm GT1
                  3400 v6
                  TOG headers
                  RSM 62MM T-body
                  FFP underdrive pulley
                  GRANATELLI MAF
                  Ported upper intake
                  MSD DIS 4 ignition box
                  MSD Wires and coils (pending)
                  Venom high flow fuel pump (pending)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have a 95 Buick ecm that I’m fitting into my car, and this sounds like an issue I'm having, When the car is at WOT the computer goes lean... I am using a 99 3400 MAF for my application and not the 95 Buick one that is part of the TB... What tables do I want to modify in the ECM to fix the too much air problem that it seems like I am having? I am using tunercat software to do my tuning. If you need a table list for the ecm I can get one too.

                    Got Lope?
                    3500 Build, Comp XFI Cam 218/230 .050 dur .570/.568 lift 113LSA
                    Fully Balanced, Ported, 3 Angle Valve Job, 65mm TCE TB, S&S Headers.
                    Stage-1 Raybestos/Alto 4t60e-HD, EP LSD, 3.69FDR
                    12.61@105 Epping NH Oct 2015 Nitrous 100shot (melted plugs) 13.58@98.8 N/A 3200LBS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by torq455
                      Yeah, but supposedly they say the MAF has been calibrated for the car, so no need to tune. FYI, the vette already had the ECM tuned.
                      Yeah, they can't perfectly calibrate it though with the precision that you can change things in the pcm. Lot of people on the grand am boards tried them and sometimes it would be close enough to work, but other times people would have idle issues, hard shifting, and other problems with them. The new MAF doesn't have a screen like the old one does, so if their intake wasn't perfectly straight and smooth they'd get air buffeting and throw the signal off. None of those people ever actually dyno tested the MAF either and very few scanned with it in. They just imagined they got a HP increase from the placebo effect. Many of them were still using stock 56mm TB's too with the huge MAF.

                      I have a used one I bought from someone (LT1 MAF recalibrated for grand am with CAI) and I intend to dyno test it with before and after from the stock MAF using the same intake and filter for accurate results. I also plan to dyno and scan it after making changes to the MAF table in the pcm, and I'd like to do the same to an NA car with that MAF if I can find a volunteer around me.
                      '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
                      '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
                      13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
                      Gotta love boost!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by torq455
                        Yeah, but supposedly they say the MAF has been calibrated for the car, so no need to tune. FYI, the vette already had the ECM tuned.
                        Thus the reason why the vette lost power. When MAF manufacturer's say its "tuned for the car" they really mean is, we changed the frequency response of our MAF vs your stock unit. It makes your ECM think its receiving more air, than what is there.

                        Since the vette had a tuned ECM, its MAF table was already tweaked with the stock MAF. Changing the MAF mean't needing the corresponding MAF table to go with it.
                        Your local OBDII moderator

                        2000 Grand Am GT w/ WOT parts

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If you have a straight tube before and after the MAF, you can remove the screen AND recalibrate it to gain power and keep drivability and gas milage. Tuning is the key to this though.
                          Ben
                          60DegreeV6.com
                          WOT-Tech.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            tuning aside, upgrading to a bigger MAF sensor isn't really worth it unless you have run out of bolt-on's or are running boost.

                            in either case, i think you'd be better off getting a 85mm ls1/ls2/ls6 MAF off of ebay and buying/tuning that as it is a ton cheaper than the granatelli one.
                            The Official Rotating Mass Nazi

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I fully agree. I was running a stock MAF up to 11 PSI, and coulda pushed a lil more.
                              Regards,

                              Todd E. Johnson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X