Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone running a solid cam?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    The flat tappets kept failing on me, so I went with the roller. The flat tappet can only take so much pressure, etc without issues, so..
    Curtis
    91\' Turbo Z24
    http://www.turboz24.com

    Comment


    • #17
      Seriously? I didn't think they'd be any more susceptable to failure, than the hydraulics.... definetely something I'll bring up to them!
      3.1L \'88 Camaro - 16G @ 9.5psi
      222/291 @ wheels

      T61 on the way!

      Comment


      • #18
        Remember with a turbo to try and open up that LSA. Less overlap means more cylinder pressure

        If you are getting a cam ground and really want to make something happen be sure they know this is for a turbo application.
        1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
        1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
        Because... I am, CANADIAN

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by betterthanyou
          Remember with a turbo to try and open up that LSA. Less overlap means more cylinder pressure

          If you are getting a cam ground and really want to make something happen be sure they know this is for a turbo application.
          QFT!

          After talking with a few turbo guys and playing with DD2K, looking at some set-ups, it seems that LSAs between 112 and 116 seem to be the area for a turbo engine, especially a higher boost app.

          Comment


          • #20
            There is a blown impala in my GM high Tech mag with a Comp 236/244 @ .050 Cam with 114* LSA

            It makes 740 HP
            1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
            1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
            Because... I am, CANADIAN

            Comment


            • #21
              meh... got off the phone with Comp - they recommend -

              16-000-5

              Grind number
              CV6 252-1/252-1 S 112 + 4

              213/213 @ .050"

              .435/.435"

              112 LSA + 4º Advanced

              6500rpm max power (shift point) Solid flat tappet

              Seems awful close to the Crower 03065 I was ALREADY looking at, and that's off the shelf....

              Calling Crower in 15 minutes (they're closed for lunch, lol)
              3.1L \'88 Camaro - 16G @ 9.5psi
              222/291 @ wheels

              T61 on the way!

              Comment


              • #22
                Fuck I called COMP like 4 times today. Its always busy. I need some info on spring retainers.
                1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                Because... I am, CANADIAN

                Comment


                • #23
                  LOL, I know the feeling... anyone know if Crower has titanium retainers?
                  3.1L \'88 Camaro - 16G @ 9.5psi
                  222/291 @ wheels

                  T61 on the way!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    http://www.crower.com/misc/m_cat.shtml PG. 144

                    As far as if any of them fit the 660, I don't know. But yes, they do have titanium retainers. I'm sure you could cross-reference something and find ones that fit.
                    -Brad-
                    89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                    sigpic
                    Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I am running a Crain solid kit. It is in a road racer Fiero. It is 260/260 @ .050 with .591 lift and 1.6 rockers. It uses pittle valve lifters that were modifide Crain pieces. If you don't do the mods, it will burn up the cam and lifters. It also uses Crain dual valve springs and titanium retainers. It required modifying the valve stems and pockets because of the lift. Crain supplied the tool. The springs are about 20% heavier than the single LS2 springs.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Anyone mind if I throw a kinda sideways twist to this thread? I have been following this thread since it began and it seems like what I want to do with my motor. I've got a 2.8 H.O. (8.9comp.) ironhead, carb (see the sideways twist? no comfuters). I want it to spin over 7k RELIABLY. So far I've got a Holley 390 (model 4160) 4 bbl. carb and edelbrock hi rise intake. I plan on making my own headers and using sidepipes. So, will these cam's work for what I want and can I use 1.6 rockers?
                        Tuning a car is full of compromises. You must decide if you are willing to give up either reliability, performance, or a whole load of cash. Also remember that repairs will seem to come up much more often as you strive for even more performance

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Everyone I've talked to so far, about my camshaft, has recommended a single pattern cam, rather than a dual pattern, because of my turbo system.... Lazer cams recommended a 215/215 @ .050, .435/.435" lift, running a set of stiff Eaton lifters.
                          3.1L \'88 Camaro - 16G @ 9.5psi
                          222/291 @ wheels

                          T61 on the way!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by X11_STE
                            I've got a 2.8 H.O. (8.9comp.) ironhead, carb (see the sideways twist? no comfuters). I want it to spin over 7k RELIABLY.
                            If it is a small journal crank, I wouldn't plan on spinning it that high.
                            '99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
                            '98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
                            '84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
                            '88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now

                            Quote of the week:
                            Originally posted by Aaron
                            This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Agree with Marty (RacerX11), switch to a large journal block and crank, hell might as well stroke it too, while you're at it.

                              Anyway, I've mostly seen dual pattern cams for turbo vehicles, usually early to open on the exhaust side, early to close with lots of lift, and a longerduration on the intake side, with less overall lift. Odd that you'd be told something different.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by RacerX11
                                Originally posted by X11_STE
                                I've got a 2.8 H.O. (8.9comp.) ironhead, carb (see the sideways twist? no comfuters). I want it to spin over 7k RELIABLY.
                                If it is a small journal crank, I wouldn't plan on spinning it that high.
                                Hehehehe, Marty, you should know me better than that! I DO plan on using the small journal block, but not the small crank. Get the idea? I will have the block machined to accept the larger crank and possibly have the crank cryro treated. No problems with high rpm's.
                                Tuning a car is full of compromises. You must decide if you are willing to give up either reliability, performance, or a whole load of cash. Also remember that repairs will seem to come up much more often as you strive for even more performance

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X