Do you have trouble with it dying?? and do you still have it installed?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Part Compatibility on my topend rebuild?? ::UPDATED::
Collapse
X
-
It wouldn't run on its own for the first 2 minutes or so. After that, it was just a really lopey idle. No, its no longer installed, only because I swapped a 3400 into the car. CNCGuy has the cam though and will be installing it in one of his engines.-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
Comment
-
Head work dont mean shit. It is not going to make the cam work any better. The problem comes with the large duration and narrow LSA. This means lots of overlap and in turn poor scavenging of the cylinders at idle along with low vacuum. The PCM will not like this. It is possible to get the PCM reprogrammed to work with the lower vacuum. But the idle will still be lopy. However the cam will be very powerful in the top end.
Me personally I would like to see an LSA of 112 instead. Oh and if you ever plan on boost that is a VERY bad cam. If it had an LSA if 114 to 116 it would be good for boost.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
Comment