Tell me your times....

[fierofanatic88]

I doubt you'll get into the 13s. The Fieros with DOHC swaps are landing right at flat 14s, and that is with about 220hp, and the power curve of the DOHC. But definately expect low 14s, and who knows, maybe you can break that barrier.[/quote]


But arent the DOHC'c engines heavier?And most of them are going in the already heavier GT(fastback) models.The coupes are almost 200 lbs lighter out of the factory with the standard 2.8 so I should pickup some time with the notchback. Maybe I can get to the high 13's.

[Anonymous]

But arent the DOHC'c engines heavier?And most of them are going in the already heavier GT(fastback) models.The coupes are almost 200 lbs lighter out of the factory with the standard 2.8 so I should pickup some time with the notchback. Maybe I can get to the high 13's.

Yes they are, by about 50lbs or so. Most are going to be in the fastbacks(mine will be). You might be able to, it really is hard to say. I'm sure traction will be an issue as well.

[rudefyet]

It needs to be updated, but...

http://www.60degreev6.com/index.php?...ewtopic&t=4121

oh yeah...rub it in why don't you...."Really Slow Cars"...pffft

[Doward]

15.015 @ 94 mph, and 15.4 @ 98mph. I have no traction. 291 lbs/ft of torque is to blame.

[dawg]

went a 14.66 @ 94.15 MPH with a 3.2/3100 hybrid

for details http://www.v6z24.com/registry/z24dawg
thats with stock 3100 heads, going to run fully ported and polished heads in 05

probobly looking at 160 hp at the wheels or so

[mfewtrail]

my best run was 9.32 in the 1/8th mile in my 4 door 96 grand am. i should be running a 15 or so in the quarter. 2 1/2 inch kink bent pipes(yuk), cai, and a wet 75 shot.

9.32 in the 1/8th usually equates to more like a 14.6.14-7ish 1/4 mile ET.

[patgizz]

car: 94 lumina 4 door euro
engine: 3.1 mpfi
trans: 4T60-e
1/4 time: 18.1@71mph


guess why i have a 3400 now

[skalor]

'89 Turbo Grand Prix with the following mods:
-Jeff M. X-over
-K&N filter
-DSM BOV
-getrag 284 with stock clutch
-modifies chip to work with 5 speed with around 11 psi of boost

Everything else is stock, right down to the 128,000 mile catalytic converter.

14.643 @ 96.89 with a 2.258 60'

http://www.gmv6.org/images/11-14-04.jpg

[skalor]

All of this in my '85 GMC Jimmy, running, with traction problems and fuel delevery problems, a 13.8 @ 99.

You should get some 'Caltrax' style traction bars as they work great. My brother in his 3800 SII S-10 was having series traction issues with 245/50/16 tires so we made up some 'Caltrax' style traction bars for him. He went from a 2.5 without to a 2.0 with on street tires. I think you can pick up a set for around $150, but we just made our own.

http://www.gmv6.org/tractionbars.html

[donk_316]

I doubt you'll get into the 13s. The Fieros with DOHC swaps are landing right at flat 14s, and that is with about 220hp, and the power curve of the DOHC. But definately expect low 14s, and who knows, maybe you can break that barrier
But arent the DOHC'c engines heavier?And most of them are going in the already heavier GT(fastback) models.The coupes are almost 200 lbs lighter out of the factory with the standard 2.8 so I should pickup some time with the notchback. Maybe I can get to the high 13's.

Your formula will maybe see mid 14's...not mid 13's like stated earlier.

[Jeff420]

my best run was 9.32 in the 1/8th mile in my 4 door 96 grand am. i should be running a 15 or so in the quarter. 2 1/2 inch kink bent pipes(yuk), cai, and a wet 75 shot.

9.32 in the 1/8th usually equates to more like a 14.6.14-7ish 1/4 mile ET.

i guessed 15 because someone else with mods similar to mine ran around that time. Id rather say im slower than i really am than vice versa

[1QUICKHATCH]

84 cavalier stock 3100 5spd 9.3:1 compression, 2" exaust, 1984 suspension... best on slicks was a 14.30
best on street tires for this year was 14.96@ 91 and second best was a 15.02@ 93

[dbtk2]

I have a '90 Grand Prix STE Sedan w/3.1L Turbo. Mods in my sig. I have ran a best of 14.695 @ 94.49 at the track, but this was before my cam/topend/ud pulley. With the current setup, I have G-tech times reporting 13.9's, but that is untuned and with a 2.2 60'. With some tuning, larger fuel injectors, and some traction, I believe its a 13.6-13.7 second car, but thats just a guess.

However, I only have proof of a 14.695 at the time.

Shawn

[Jeff420]

from what i hear those g-techs are pretty accurate usually only saying that your about a 1/10-2/10 of a second faster than you really are.

[dbtk2]

Well, it all depends on how well you calibrate it, and if you're on flat road, etc.. When the car was stock I pulled a 15.334 on the G-tech, but at the track I went 14.968 with the exact same setup. (except I dropped tire pressure a little and pulled out the spare tire & jack). But it is pretty close.

Shawn