Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A question about installing 3400 heads on my 3.4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A question about installing 3400 heads on my 3.4

    I have a 1993 3.4 iron head that I rebuilt to stock and have been running for a couple of years now. I have some intake work to do and I was wondering if it would make sense to install aluminum heads from a 3400? My biggest concern is the compressed ratio I would get since I have the stock flat pistons in there. I don't want to tear down the whole motor to replace the pistons in addition to all the other work I would have to do. Is there another reasonable alternative, head spacers, modifying the iron heads?
    1990 Trooper, 3.4L TBI, Comp Cam 252H, Rodeo clutch and front brakes, Superwinch, and funky luggage carrier.

  • #2
    I think there have been a few people who have dealt with the higher compression ratio with pump gas before

    Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
    '89 Firebird, 3500 Turbo, T56, 9-bolt/4.11
    '86 Fiero, 3500, 4-speed

    Comment


    • #3
      good excuse for a cam fat enough to bleed off enough dynamic compression to allow 91/93 octane?
      1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
      Latest nAst1 files here!
      Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

      Comment


      • #4
        3500 heads and a healthy cam with 3400 headgaskets.


        the 3400 gaskets are .020 thicker compressed and will fit the 3.62" bore better so less carbon buildup. Makes for 11.57:1 SCR
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Superdave View Post
          3500 heads and a healthy cam with 3400 headgaskets.


          the 3400 gaskets are .020 thicker compressed and will fit the 3.62" bore better so less carbon buildup. Makes for 11.57:1 SCR
          That would mean premium gas wouldn't it?
          1990 Trooper, 3.4L TBI, Comp Cam 252H, Rodeo clutch and front brakes, Superwinch, and funky luggage carrier.

          Comment


          • #6
            Yes.

            You could probably grind in some valve reliefs and get that a little lower but you're still in 91/93 territory. With good tuning and a good cam like Robert mentioned it would be fine though. It'll sound mean too. lol
            Past Builds;
            1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
            1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
            Current Project;
            1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Superdave View Post
              3500 heads and a healthy cam with 3400 headgaskets.

              the 3400 gaskets are .020 thicker compressed and will fit the 3.62" bore better so less carbon buildup. Makes for 11.57:1 SCR
              But that will yield a 0.070" quench height, which is terrible.

              IMO, the OP would be better off just biting the bullet and getting 3400 pistons & rings.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Blacktree View Post
                But that will yield a 0.070" quench height, which is terrible.

                IMO, the OP would be better off just biting the bullet and getting 3400 pistons & rings.
                you don't know what his quench height would be, because you don't know what his quench height is currently.

                If you have e85 where you live OP, then you can get away with the higher CR no problem. Cali has 91 oct other than that, so you might have to retard the timing a bit otherwise with aluminum head swap.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bigcheese View Post
                  you don't know what his quench height would be, because you don't know what his quench height is currently.
                  I think it's safe to say he's not going to have anything close to optimal quench height, using the F-Body pistons and 3400 head gaskets. It doesn't take a math wizard to figure that out.

                  That said, the 3400 in stock form has a better quench height than a 3.4 V6 in stock form (0.040" for the 3400 vs 0.050" for the 3.4). So switching to 3400 head gaskets and pistons will be a win-win.

                  Of course, this all assumes the OP intends to use regular gasoline. If he wants to use E85, then the F-body pistons with thinner head gaskets (whatever thickness is needed to get optimal quench height) would be the way to go.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X