Originally posted by trotterlg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MAF & air intake questions
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Zandoz View PostNothing more than the multitude out there running LS V8s...or alloy wheels...or super/turbo chargers...or disk brakes...or stereos...or tilt steering columns............not too many 4bbl carbs back then.
The ones pictured have modern Ford 2.3 SOHC 4s...and are 1920s bodies...1926/27 Model T to be specific. The same that I'm hoping to use with mine.
The beauty of building a hot rod is that you can build it any way you want and can afford.
Some technologies are unavoidable like tolerances. Back then the gap between piston and cylinder wall was greater then today by a large factor.
Naturally, rebuilding one today the tolerances can be much tighter.
This looks to be one cool project!
Originally posted by Z26-T View PostI'd have to say no turbo is the problem..Last edited by TGP37; 02-26-2013, 02:54 PM.1996 Grand Prix | 3100v6 L82 | T04E-50 Turbo | Getrag 282 w/ EP LSD | SPEC-3 Clutch
Comment
-
Originally posted by TGP37 View PostI agree and in fact custom parts are a must. Doubt every OEM item can be found w/o breaking the bank for such an older car.
Some technologies are unavoidable like tolerances. Back then the gap between piston and cylinder wall was greater then today by a large factor.
Naturally, rebuilding one today the tolerances can be much tighter.
This looks to be one cool project!
I concure, toss some boost in that girl.
I had never had a thought about doing anything with a 60V6. At the point I ran across this engine, what I was looking for is almost from another planet...an old Studebaker V8. My intent was to rebuild one, and maybe someday find a car to put it in. I stumbled across this little 2.8 & 700R4 for less than scrap value...I could not ignore them. Then I had to figure out what to do with them...this is what evolved.
Part of the reason for doing this the way I am is the old bug-a-boo...money. I'm doing this on a disability income, part at a time, as I can find them for a price I can afford. The reason I'm going with the little T-Bucket / Track-Roadster is that because of the size, weight, and simplicity I'd not need to worry a lot about high dollar speed equipment like turbos to have some fun. Down the road, when I get the rest of the car farther along, then I'll consider something along those lines
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zandoz View PostI had never had a thought about doing anything with a 60V6. At the point I ran across this engine, what I was looking for is almost from another planet...an old Studebaker V8. My intent was to rebuild one, and maybe someday find a car to put it in. I stumbled across this little 2.8 & 700R4 for less than scrap value...I could not ignore them. Then I had to figure out what to do with them...this is what evolved.
Part of the reason for doing this the way I am is the old bug-a-boo...money. I'm doing this on a disability income, part at a time, as I can find them for a price I can afford. The reason I'm going with the little T-Bucket / Track-Roadster is that because of the size, weight, and simplicity I'd not need to worry a lot about high dollar speed equipment like turbos to have some fun. Down the road, when I get the rest of the car farther along, then I'll consider something along those lines
Honestly, I think having to wait for funds between mods adds character, a sort of solid nature versus a quick slap together.1996 Grand Prix | 3100v6 L82 | T04E-50 Turbo | Getrag 282 w/ EP LSD | SPEC-3 Clutch
Comment
-
I'd stick with the old Rochester varijet for a carb. Had a old Chevy c10 with the inter grated head straight 6 with the varijet. Was problem free. I don't know if the 2.8 had a smaller varijet.88 Beretta GTU turbo . 90 Black ASC/McLaren TGP, awaiting 4t80. 2003 Grand AM se 3400/4t45 daily grind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TurboGTU View PostI'd stick with the old Rochester varijet for a carb. Had a old Chevy c10 with the inter grated head straight 6 with the varijet. Was problem free. I don't know if the 2.8 had a smaller varijet.
I think the problem with these engines and the varajet is the intake....
Comment
Comment