Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MAF & air intake questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by trotterlg View Post
    Lets see................A 1930's or 40's roadster with a fuel injected engine, what is wrong with this picture? Larry
    I'd have to say no turbo is the problem..
    You may or may not know 10 times what i do.
    ASE Master certified. Just means I can take tests. GM ASEP Graduate.
    95' Z26, ported/cammed 3400/3500, OBD2, 282, T3T4. Boxes almost all empty..

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Zandoz View Post
      Nothing more than the multitude out there running LS V8s...or alloy wheels...or super/turbo chargers...or disk brakes...or stereos...or tilt steering columns............not too many 4bbl carbs back then.

      The ones pictured have modern Ford 2.3 SOHC 4s...and are 1920s bodies...1926/27 Model T to be specific. The same that I'm hoping to use with mine.

      The beauty of building a hot rod is that you can build it any way you want and can afford.
      I agree and in fact custom parts are a must. Doubt every OEM item can be found w/o breaking the bank for such an older car.

      Some technologies are unavoidable like tolerances. Back then the gap between piston and cylinder wall was greater then today by a large factor.

      Naturally, rebuilding one today the tolerances can be much tighter.



      This looks to be one cool project!

      Originally posted by Z26-T View Post
      I'd have to say no turbo is the problem..
      I concure, toss some boost in that girl.
      Last edited by TGP37; 02-26-2013, 02:54 PM.
      1996 Grand Prix | 3100v6 L82 | T04E-50 Turbo | Getrag 282 w/ EP LSD | SPEC-3 Clutch

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by TGP37 View Post
        I agree and in fact custom parts are a must. Doubt every OEM item can be found w/o breaking the bank for such an older car.

        Some technologies are unavoidable like tolerances. Back then the gap between piston and cylinder wall was greater then today by a large factor.

        Naturally, rebuilding one today the tolerances can be much tighter.


        This looks to be one cool project!



        I concure, toss some boost in that girl.


        I had never had a thought about doing anything with a 60V6. At the point I ran across this engine, what I was looking for is almost from another planet...an old Studebaker V8. My intent was to rebuild one, and maybe someday find a car to put it in. I stumbled across this little 2.8 & 700R4 for less than scrap value...I could not ignore them. Then I had to figure out what to do with them...this is what evolved.

        Part of the reason for doing this the way I am is the old bug-a-boo...money. I'm doing this on a disability income, part at a time, as I can find them for a price I can afford. The reason I'm going with the little T-Bucket / Track-Roadster is that because of the size, weight, and simplicity I'd not need to worry a lot about high dollar speed equipment like turbos to have some fun. Down the road, when I get the rest of the car farther along, then I'll consider something along those lines

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Zandoz View Post
          I had never had a thought about doing anything with a 60V6. At the point I ran across this engine, what I was looking for is almost from another planet...an old Studebaker V8. My intent was to rebuild one, and maybe someday find a car to put it in. I stumbled across this little 2.8 & 700R4 for less than scrap value...I could not ignore them. Then I had to figure out what to do with them...this is what evolved.

          Part of the reason for doing this the way I am is the old bug-a-boo...money. I'm doing this on a disability income, part at a time, as I can find them for a price I can afford. The reason I'm going with the little T-Bucket / Track-Roadster is that because of the size, weight, and simplicity I'd not need to worry a lot about high dollar speed equipment like turbos to have some fun. Down the road, when I get the rest of the car farther along, then I'll consider something along those lines
          On a budget, me too, like most of us....lol

          Honestly, I think having to wait for funds between mods adds character, a sort of solid nature versus a quick slap together.
          1996 Grand Prix | 3100v6 L82 | T04E-50 Turbo | Getrag 282 w/ EP LSD | SPEC-3 Clutch

          Comment


          • #20
            I'd stick with the old Rochester varijet for a carb. Had a old Chevy c10 with the inter grated head straight 6 with the varijet. Was problem free. I don't know if the 2.8 had a smaller varijet.
            88 Beretta GTU turbo . 90 Black ASC/McLaren TGP, awaiting 4t80. 2003 Grand AM se 3400/4t45 daily grind.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by TurboGTU View Post
              I'd stick with the old Rochester varijet for a carb. Had a old Chevy c10 with the inter grated head straight 6 with the varijet. Was problem free. I don't know if the 2.8 had a smaller varijet.
              A properly tuned varajet will run circles around a weber.
              I think the problem with these engines and the varajet is the intake....

              Comment


              • #22
                If I still had access to a machine shop, I'd make my own manifold, and mount a pair of SU HS-4s for each bank of cylinders...just to be totally different....LOL

                Comment

                Working...
                X