Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aftermarket Cams in the 3.1L

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    i get the feeling it's due to the way the EBL algorithm works.... very few masks got both an initial advance and spark reference angle value.... or at least, very few were labeled as such. technically, all of them have a spark reference value, but most just call it initial advance, since that's what the distributor is set to.

    in A1(and the other 60V6 MPFI stuff), ref angle is what they refer to as "initial advance" and initial advance is actually the first spark advance value used when calculations are done. so basically timing while cranking(for at least a revolution anyways).

    so, i'd change it to 60 and if necessary, play with other stuff to get the cranking advance correct.
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

    Comment


    • #32
      It ran my car, but I only let it start up and idle. Jumps right up to 1200 RPM. I am not going to drive it because I have no idea what its doing without datalogging ability. That and I have no idea if the stock hardware is going to work with a chip designed for a different board.
      Ben
      60DegreeV6.com
      WOT-Tech.com

      Comment


      • #33
        Do you mean the EBL P4 Flash system?

        Originally posted by SappySE107 View Post
        It ran my car, but I only let it start up and idle. Jumps right up to 1200 RPM. I am not going to drive it because I have no idea what its doing without datalogging ability. That and I have no idea if the stock hardware is going to work with a chip designed for a different board.

        Comment


        • #34
          So it might be that I am adding too much Initial SA?

          That makes sense because I can't add much SA in the table values w/o knock alerts or loss of power.

          Do you know the timing limit of the LHO heads?

          I will turn the Initial SA back, but I'll call Bob to do it, because it has to be done in the hex editor for that high of a value.


          Thanks!

          Originally posted by robertisaar View Post
          i get the feeling it's due to the way the EBL algorithm works.... very few masks got both an initial advance and spark reference angle value.... or at least, very few were labeled as such. technically, all of them have a spark reference value, but most just call it initial advance, since that's what the distributor is set to.

          in A1(and the other 60V6 MPFI stuff), ref angle is what they refer to as "initial advance" and initial advance is actually the first spark advance value used when calculations are done. so basically timing while cranking(for at least a revolution anyways).

          so, i'd change it to 60 and if necessary, play with other stuff to get the cranking advance correct.

          Comment


          • #35
            that BIN only contains calibration...... no algorithm. so in reality, you were running in limp-home mode, Ben.


            i would just set the "initial advance" to 60* and see what happens. if you have a timing light, you could verify that what is being commanded is actually being seen by the engine.
            1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
            Latest nAst1 files here!
            Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

            Comment


            • #36
              yeah. I think it's worth a try.

              there's SOMETHING up with this setup.

              The reason I blamed the cam was because that was the only thing I changed and there's

              NO WAY I MADE ANY MISTAKES AT ALL! Ha Ha!

              Comment


              • #37
                Not even getting the chain off just one little tooth advanced? Larry

                Comment


                • #38
                  ha ha! I am of course kidding. But I did try really hard to put it together correctly.

                  I ran into trouble with a couple of rod caps that got switched. I never had more than 1 apart at a time, and my machinist swears that he never made a mistake.

                  But I noticed that the markings he made on the rods - his 6 looks like a 2. And those were the two that you got mixed up.

                  I was extra careful when installing the timing chain. It's funny that you should mention that because it a local speed shop asked me if I had indexed the cam. I don't think I can without a special cam gear, which I don't think exists.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by IDCavalier View Post
                    Yeah, he's good!

                    I am new to tuning so I don't know what a constant is.

                    I know that the EBL P4 Flash is badass tho. I just wish I could make the most out of its potential.

                    There are a lot of things called scalars in the advanced xdf that I don't know how they might affect performance.

                    Bob has been a great help to me.

                    What is TGO?
                    thirdgen.org The big 3rd gen Fbody forum.
                    "I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I guess I've been lurking here for a while, no posts though. This cam thread had me lit for some info.
                      I have a 1st gen S10, which I swapped in a '95 Maro 3.4. I run non TBI, so it has an Eddy/Holley and every other conceivable mod without changing any reciprocating parts.
                      So, the cam is a .515/.525 lift, .292 adv duration, 110 split. Yes, it idles like a prostock car and it sounds WAY radical. I have driven 32K miles like this and it gets 20-22 mpg @70 with A/C on the hiway (!!??). Around town though, it SUX. Anyway, my best 1320 is 14.9 @ 94 MPH.
                      Here's the specs:
                      Mallory HEI dizzy
                      Cloyes double roller chain advanced 4*
                      Heddmen hedders with 3" exhaust
                      Eddy/ Holley 390 CFM
                      Compudyne radical cam
                      Crane roller rockers - stock ratio (had to - busted a rocker stud. It now has ARP studs)
                      4.10 rear w/ Eaton clutch posi
                      T5 w/ Exedy comp clutch
                      Stock valve springs!! (my rev auto limiter!)
                      This is a daily driver and is a gas to drive in town. It spins tires hard, and outruns most stock 5.0s. The ricers bum.
                      So, this cam was spec'd for a 3.1, according to the cam sheet. I bought it on Ebay and the auction said it was a mild cam - haha
                      I guess the right combo of parts works every time...
                      Sorry guys, EFI is way to PIA to tune correctly for this combo. I am pretty sure this cam would never run with the TBI - even modified.
                      Last edited by Mad Max; 12-02-2012, 10:39 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        you should start your own thread... but yes, you could tune that engine to run on EFI. I've got a bigger cam than that and was running ITB's on my Camaro.

                        Did you check for coil bind at all? that's way past what should be possible on stock valve springs.
                        Past Builds;
                        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                        Current Project;
                        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Haha I thought that was you with that 3500 cavi
                          Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                          the value you have for Initial SA seems wrong. I haven't used an EBL but in the other OBD1 masks for the 60v6 initial SA is 9.14 degrees. ($A1 code which is stock for your car)

                          In the standard masks we also have a value called "Spark reference angle" which is 59.86 degrees (60).


                          Your value of 69.96 looks like he added those 2 together.. which is what his mask may need but I'd ask him about it, he may have more info as i know nothing about how he's designed that mask.



                          Also, that extended SA table needs some work



                          I looked into the EBL for mine, it has some cool features but i just stuck with the '7730 and bought an emulator to tune the code that was built for the engine/platform. i ran that in my '91 Z24 with various wild engines for 9 years and have had the same ecm in my Camaro for 3 years now. (Search user "Whitelightning2" on Youtube for videos of my Cavalier and Camaro)

                          Since your car is still stock the most you'll pick up from tuning is like 5 or 6 HP, IMO it's just easier to run the stock tune till you get into wilder engine builds. Then you'll at least get to enjoy the car.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                            you should start your own thread... but yes, you could tune that engine to run on EFI. I've got a bigger cam than that and was running ITB's on my Camaro.

                            Did you check for coil bind at all? that's way past what should be possible on stock valve springs.
                            I did check for coil bind - no prob. I don't think I could have gone much more for lift though. The rocker geometry is at the maximum travel. I can feel the valves float at about 5500 rpms. I don't run it to 5500 much, but it has no complaints visiting that slot.
                            I will start a thread, I have been WAY happy with this engine, and the CRAZIEST part is: it has close to 300K miles on it!! How??
                            I've been waiting for it to go bang but it still runs way hard and strong.
                            I just drove it from Baton Rouge to Denver, then towed a '67 GMC pickup chassis back to New York State...
                            Defying gravity every inch of the way.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I've heard that the 3.4s are real powerhouses.

                              Good for you!

                              I really enjoy hearing about success stories..I hope I can tell one in the future!

                              With my setup, even the Comp cams website, along with the guys here say that my cam will work fine with fuel injection.

                              But it's only a .390/.390 at the valves with a 108.0 lobe separation (is that what "split" means?)

                              Then, after having power problems, I called the Comp cams tech line. - He told me that 108 is way too tight to run FI. Why do they say 1 thing and then another?

                              Swapping the cam is tough to do on this li'l FWD!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                A LSA of 108 isn't really that tight, depends on the duration also, the cam I have has a LSA or 99.5, but I am running a carb and 12 to one CR. Larry

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X