Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How much KR is expected from a stock motor?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How much KR is expected from a stock motor?

    Hey all.

    I'm just throwing this question out there...
    I have a 2001 Malibu with a 3100.
    I've got a 65 mm TB, ported UIM, CAI and 2.5 mandrel bent catback.

    Now I went to the track this past weekend and was not getting particularly good numbers.

    Quickhatch from this site scanned my car with hptuners and found that I had I believe 4 degrees of KR in first and up to 9 degrees in 3rd gear!

    Now these numbers seem high to me; however I don't really have anything to compare against....

    Would a stock motor have this much KR? Is this KR as a result of needing a tune? Lingering issues with the car?

    Just curious your thoughts on this!

    Thanks!

  • #2
    the problem with the stock tune is it's a general tune for a car in Canada and another in Arizona.
    when you have knock it could be a lot of stuff ( some even combining) like lack/too much fuel,transmission noises,not accurate Maf table VE table and too much timing ( which i believe is the case with 3100-3400.) on my car it was the transmission that was giving lot of Kr but i was able to find out because it would happen always in the same condition at the same rpm ( at cruise when the Tcc locks)
    Mike 60degree addict.
    Beretta 96 3500 - 14.981@ 93.32
    sigpic
    65MM thorttle body, Crank trigger 97 venture ECM and Dhp powrTuner

    Comment


    • #3
      Thats fair enough..
      That brings another question to mind for me...
      If you do a tune in say the summer (or winter); does this imply that it may not be effective in the next season?

      Also, is the amount of KR I'm seeing holding me back just a little, a lot? How much is the impact?

      Comment


      • #4
        What octane were you running at that time of KR?
        Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.

        Comment


        • #5
          Regular grade..still seems much no?
          Is it possible to quantify at all how much this holds (Held) me back?

          My track times were not good...
          I only ran a best of 16.01 at 85 mph...

          The thing that bothers me is that I read threads where guys with grand ams were doing 15.4-15.6 at 86 mph...
          Grand Am's have more agressive greaing (GT's atleast); I mean sure part of it is launch but with such a low power car do I really lose that many tenths?

          Just trying to figure out whats up here... Do I need a tune? Is something up with the car?
          I plan on getting a tune either way just trying to track down other problems while I'm at it...if there are problems and the thing simply isn't just damn slow!

          Comment


          • #6
            Can you clarify what regular grade means? It could be a variation of octanes.
            Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.

            Comment


            • #7
              Apologies, I meant 87 octane.

              Thanks

              Comment


              • #8
                Try using 100% 92 octane not blending it with anything else and go do exactly what you did to try and register that kr again while using that 92 octane.
                Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.

                Comment


                • #9
                  but 16.01 on a 3100 with only a TB is good time...but what you did is change th Volumetric efficiency and the Maf table of your car.
                  before paying for tuning I highly uggest you do a headder on your car and after you tune...the biggest gains will come from the exhuast I guarantee it. i don't really tune for winter since i don't care about performance. but summer nights is the best time to tune.
                  Mike 60degree addict.
                  Beretta 96 3500 - 14.981@ 93.32
                  sigpic
                  65MM thorttle body, Crank trigger 97 venture ECM and Dhp powrTuner

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mickaz View Post
                    but 16.01 on a 3100 with only a TB is good time...but what you did is change th Volumetric efficiency and the Maf table of your car.
                    before paying for tuning I highly uggest you do a headder on your car and after you tune...the biggest gains will come from the exhuast I guarantee it. i don't really tune for winter since i don't care about performance. but summer nights is the best time to tune.
                    I just thought I'd be doing better considering motor week ran a 15.7 in a 3400 Alero.. I mean there's barely a difference between the engines; hell in the n-body it's even less of a difference between 3100 and 3400 (170 to 175 hp).
                    I also did a 2.5 catback which dynoed + 10 fwhp on a stock Grand Am GT, I don't expect that much but at least close..

                    I am looking to do headers; they're just hard to find....being in Canada doesn't make it any better..

                    I do plan a tune after headers...

                    I've also got a 3500 UIM with plenum spacers ready to go on....
                    You've got one of those correct? How did you find that difference wise? I know they'll likely flow similarly (I was thinking maybe my 3100 may even flow better because its P&P, although apparently the 3500 one is too although that's just what the buyer told; I believe him but I don't know to what extent it was)....I was just wondering if it would help powerband..

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You need tuning. We can only get about 20 degrees advance on a stock cam/head 3400 with headers and ported manifolds and a 65mm TB using 87 octane. It is what it is and the stock tune is really not very good at all. KR ruins performance.
                      Ben
                      60DegreeV6.com
                      WOT-Tech.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Fireball View Post
                        I just thought I'd be doing better considering motor week ran a 15.7 in a 3400 Alero.. I mean there's barely a difference between the engines; hell in the n-body it's even less of a difference between 3100 and 3400 (170 to 175 hp).
                        I also did a 2.5 catback which dynoed + 10 fwhp on a stock Grand Am GT, I don't expect that much but at least close..

                        I am looking to do headers; they're just hard to find....being in Canada doesn't make it any better..

                        I do plan a tune after headers...

                        I've also got a 3500 UIM with plenum spacers ready to go on....
                        You've got one of those correct? How did you find that difference wise? I know they'll likely flow similarly (I was thinking maybe my 3100 may even flow better because its P&P, although apparently the 3500 one is too although that's just what the buyer told; I believe him but I don't know to what extent it was)....I was just wondering if it would help powerband..
                        the tune in the alero is way different and the 3400 is a very strong engine.
                        you will not see alot from a 3500 UIM. headders is the best bang for the buck and a tune...what I recommend is starting with eh biggest engine and start from there.
                        Mike 60degree addict.
                        Beretta 96 3500 - 14.981@ 93.32
                        sigpic
                        65MM thorttle body, Crank trigger 97 venture ECM and Dhp powrTuner

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I agree that I wont see much but I already have it and was hoping I'd at least get a better power band going.
                          I agree that the 3400 is a good engine but aside from displacement there is no real difference between it and a 3100...

                          I really don't want to pull an engine unless it's broken really...
                          Headers are my next mod as soon as a reasonable pair pops up!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Fireball View Post
                            I agree that the 3400 is a good engine but aside from displacement there is no real difference between it and a 3100...
                            Power is the one and only difference you need LOL
                            Mike 60degree addict.
                            Beretta 96 3500 - 14.981@ 93.32
                            sigpic
                            65MM thorttle body, Crank trigger 97 venture ECM and Dhp powrTuner

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I just did a scan today on my bone stock 2003 Alero. It has 29K miles on it, ambient temp 60-70 degrees. It had not been run in a couple weeks. Fuel trims were in the negative range. It can run a 15.9 quarter on a 75 degree day. No tuning done to it, I offer it up just as one example.

                              1999 GLS MP90 supercharged / 2003 GL MP62 supercharged / 2004 GLS stock
                              Magnuson MP90 / TOG's / 3 in. Magnaflow exhaust / MSD ignition / LS1 MAF / Racetronix pump / HP Tuners / TCE 68mm TB / 36 lb Inj
                              = Best track time: 12.951 @ 104.48, 1.839 60 ft. (Beech Bend Raceway Park, 11-23-13), 50 Deg. F
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVYZPbpPzk

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X