Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ls1 maf

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ls1 maf

    i know a lot of people upgrade to a ls1 MAF sensor. but my question is why. what advantage does it give us over our stock MAFs?

    is it just simply because it has a larger diameter?
    2002 Chevy Malibu 3400sfi - Project Sleeper - Good night

    Boost - Coming soon to a malibu near you.

  • #2
    could be a few reasons here....

    could have ran out of room with the stock MAF and needed one that reads higher airflow.

    IIRC, the LSx MAFs are the largest ones GM installed.
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

    Comment


    • #3
      Don't get a LS1 MAF. Get a mini-afc.

      It takes a good bit to max one of our MAFs.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by HOYS View Post
        Don't get a LS1 MAF. Get a mini-afc.

        It takes a good bit to max one of our MAFs.
        What are you talking about? He doesn't need a mini-afc. Those are useless these days. Installing a black box to change the maf signal and trick the pcm is a hack way of doing things. Especially considering he has HP tuners. The pcm uses the maf signal for other things as well like determining engine load and calculating transmission shift pressures. Messing with that signal can screw up other things on your car. It worked back in the day when people had no other way to tune, but it's far from the best way of doing it. A proper tune is the only good way of changing the MAF signal.

        Anyway there are only two reasons to upgrade the MAF. You are either maxing out the signal, or close enough to it that the MAF is now causing an air flow restriction. Usually you have to be running boost to get close to either of those, so most people are fine with the stock MAF. As an example I am running an LS1 MAF and see just over 10,000Hz at redline and 9.5psi. Peak is 11,500Hz , so with a stock MAF I'd probably be maxed out and it would definitely be a restriction.

        Also iirc the LS1 MAF isn't the biggest one they make. I seem to remember reading something about some of the turbo GTP guys using a larger MAF from a truck or something? I didn't really pay that much attention though since I don't intend on going any larger.
        '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
        '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
        13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
        Gotta love boost!

        Comment


        • #5
          Still, you do not need an LS1 MAF. I understand the tuning process and how the MAF works, thank you.

          If you run out of MAF signal with a stock MAF you can use the mini-afc to scale the MAF signal and adjust your tune in HP tuners accordingly.

          Still, I stand by saying that you probably won't need either, it takes a lot to max our MAF.

          Comment


          • #6
            why would you want to throw in some mickey-mouse hardware when you can already do a more consistent job using proper methods, especially when the cost difference is so little?
            1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
            Latest nAst1 files here!
            Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Rootie524 View Post
              i know a lot of people upgrade to a ls1 MAF sensor. but my question is why. what advantage does it give us over our stock MAFs?

              is it just simply because it has a larger diameter?
              Same advantage as a higher flow air filter, less restriction, usually only helps in boosted setups.
              1999 GLS MP90 supercharged / 2003 GL MP62 supercharged / 2004 GLS stock
              Magnuson MP90 / TOG's / 3 in. Magnaflow exhaust / MSD ignition / LS1 MAF / Racetronix pump / HP Tuners / TCE 68mm TB / 36 lb Inj
              = Best track time: 12.951 @ 104.48, 1.839 60 ft. (Beech Bend Raceway Park, 11-23-13), 50 Deg. F
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpVYZPbpPzk

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by HOYS View Post
                Still, you do not need an LS1 MAF. I understand the tuning process and how the MAF works, thank you.

                If you run out of MAF signal with a stock MAF you can use the mini-afc to scale the MAF signal and adjust your tune in HP tuners accordingly.

                Still, I stand by saying that you probably won't need either, it takes a lot to max our MAF.
                Again... that's the WRONG way to do it. By scaling back the MAF signal your pcm isn't getting true information about the amount of air coming in or the engine load, and if you move enough air to max out the stock maf signal then it's become a restriction and needs to be upsized.
                '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
                '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
                13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
                Gotta love boost!

                Comment


                • #9
                  So what happens when you max your LS1 maf?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by HOYS View Post
                    So what happens when you max your LS1 maf?
                    ]

                    you go even bigger...but before you max out you maf...your gonna have a hell of setup.
                    Mike 60degree addict.
                    Beretta 96 3500 - 14.981@ 93.32
                    sigpic
                    65MM thorttle body, Crank trigger 97 venture ECM and Dhp powrTuner

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      yeah, the LSx MAFs read some ~500 grams/sec... good luck with that.

                      could always find out what the LS9 uses, that beast rolls out almost 640HP, that'll flow some air.
                      1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
                      Latest nAst1 files here!
                      Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by robertisaar View Post

                        could always find out what the LS9 uses, that beast rolls out almost 640HP, that'll flow some air.
                        I would rather just buy the car that it comes in to get that MAF. Time to start saving $$$...
                        -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
                        91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
                        92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed (getting there, slowly... follow the progress here)
                        94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
                        Originally posted by Jay Leno
                        Tires are cheap clutches...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by HOYS View Post
                          So what happens when you max your LS1 maf?
                          i think if your doing that on a 3400 then you are probably worrying about other things like building it to sustain the insane amount of power.
                          sigpic
                          99 Grand Am GT
                          3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
                          Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
                          1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur
                          515 515 lift 112 lsa
                          15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come


                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X