Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3500 top swap or turbo??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 3500 top swap or turbo??

    ive been debating on doing either a 3500 top swap like heads, intake and all that. or running a turbo. my car is my daily driver, so i dont want something that wont run right. some insight would be awesome
    sigpic
    - 03 Monte Carlo LS
    - 2.5" Magnaflow exhaust
    - ceramic Pacesetter headers
    - UDP and alternator pulley
    - LS6 valve springs and MMS stage 1 cam
    - d.i.y. intake with K&N con filter

    for a little guy, he runs pretty good

  • #2
    i vote both.
    1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
    Latest nAst1 files here!
    Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

    Comment


    • #3
      you'll pick up some useable power for sure with the 3500 top end however i'd get the ported stuff from wot-tech to get the most out of it.

      boost would be fun too and will probably cost about the same however you'll find the limits of your trans pretty quick.
      Past Builds;
      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
      Current Project;
      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

      Comment


      • #4
        thanks guys. with the ported 3500 LIM, do i need to get the heads ported aswell? and if so, does it flow better (stock) than a 3400 head. and with a cam, can i use the 3400 cam i already have? sorry for all of the questions lol
        sigpic
        - 03 Monte Carlo LS
        - 2.5" Magnaflow exhaust
        - ceramic Pacesetter headers
        - UDP and alternator pulley
        - LS6 valve springs and MMS stage 1 cam
        - d.i.y. intake with K&N con filter

        for a little guy, he runs pretty good

        Comment


        • #5
          3400 and 3500 cam are identical.

          and 3500 heads blow 3400 heads out of the water... and i think a stock 3500 UIM beats a stock 3400 UIM, but when ported the 3400 UIM can breathe better?
          1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
          Latest nAst1 files here!
          Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

          Comment


          • #6
            This depends on your intended use.

            On the surface I'd say turbo, just because I can see more potential gain out of it, at least initially.

            The reality comes in, when you realize that your car is just a DD, and will never really benefit from the turbo, unless it's sized differently than most people would tell you to. Most people will say get a hugeXenormous turbo, because it flows the best, and has the highest power potential. The problem here is, that people are assuming you'll be reving to 11tybillion RPM, and only care about top end HP. The reality is, that most people will never truely see the true potential of a hugeXenormous turbo. A smaller turbo that spools just off idle, or maybe a tad higher than that, say around 1500 to 1800 RPM, will make for a fun driver, and you get to actually use some of that potential power. Yeah, you'll likely choke on the top end, but how often do you go 5000+ RPM, and with all the added torque down low, will you need to rev that high now?

            After all that, I would likely say that for most people the top end swap will give the added "umph" they are looking for, without adding any extra maintenace to the package.

            Basically it boils down to not lieing to yourself and understanding what the real use of the car is, not what you think you are using it for.

            Just as an example, I will use my Datsun 240Z. It is my "toy", I bought it knowing it was never going to be a true daily driver, even though when it is together I do drive it a LOT, but it is a car to play with, to push the limits on things, to modify, to have fun with and if it breaks, it goes in the garage to get fixed or upgraded and then look for the next part to break or upgrade. It has a 2.8L I6 in it, a 30 year old engine now, the design/engine family is over 40 years old. I decided to play with the engine that was in the car when I got it, and wanted a turbo again. I happened to have a turbo off a 6.5L diesel, and decided to use it. I can drive around all day and NEVER hit boost, even reving upwards of 2800 RPM, at less than about 30% throttle. But when I puch the loud pedal past 50% and rev upwards of 6000 RPM, there is that impressive torque increase and what the car is all about. This is sized so that I get all that top end power that I want, but would NEVER want this in a DD.

            Looking back at my '85 GMC Jimmy that I built with a 3.2L 660 V6, using some small port 3100 top end and a bunch of other mismatched parts, I used a T3 turbo from a 2.3 Ford Turbo Coupe, the turbo spooled by 1800 RPM, and was, if you ignored the lack of tune, fun to drive, but it started shoking about 4800 to 5000 RPM, even though I reved it higher on occasion. I never needed to, and most of the time I would only rev it about 2500 to 3000 RPM, and that was plenty for getting around town. I could also drive around without hitting boost with this vehicle, but I had to think about it and be very gentle on the pedal, I'd say less than 20% throttle, to not get into boost. Did I care? nope, I like boost and the way the boost came in when I was accelerating like a "normal" person, just driving along, it was very smooth and just nice to drive.
            The next engine for the truck, involves a slightly larger engine, and a pair of smaller turbos, because I want the bottom end torque increase, not that upper end power.

            So what is this long winded post getting at?...

            Be honest with yourself about how the vehicle will actually be used, and base your decision on what will benefit you most from dollars and time spent.

            Comment


            • #7
              that was like eye opening lol. ive been tossing the ideas back and forth, and like you said," what will it be used for?" made me think about taking some time to buy a crap-o car. ive always loved the sound and power coming from the turbo, i was just to afraid to blow up my transmission lol. so with all that said, the top swap will go on, for better flow, then will definitely be getting a turbo slapped on it. i really appreciate what you guys said, and hopefully i will be getting some of this done by summers end. thanks again guys.
              sigpic
              - 03 Monte Carlo LS
              - 2.5" Magnaflow exhaust
              - ceramic Pacesetter headers
              - UDP and alternator pulley
              - LS6 valve springs and MMS stage 1 cam
              - d.i.y. intake with K&N con filter

              for a little guy, he runs pretty good

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by The_Raven View Post
                This depends on your intended use.

                On the surface I'd say turbo, just because I can see more potential gain out of it, at least initially.

                The reality comes in, when you realize that your car is just a DD, and will never really benefit from the turbo, unless it's sized differently than most people would tell you to. Most people will say get a hugeXenormous turbo, because it flows the best, and has the highest power potential. The problem here is, that people are assuming you'll be reving to 11tybillion RPM, and only care about top end HP. The reality is, that most people will never truely see the true potential of a hugeXenormous turbo. A smaller turbo that spools just off idle, or maybe a tad higher than that, say around 1500 to 1800 RPM, will make for a fun driver, and you get to actually use some of that potential power. Yeah, you'll likely choke on the top end, but how often do you go 5000+ RPM, and with all the added torque down low, will you need to rev that high now?

                After all that, I would likely say that for most people the top end swap will give the added "umph" they are looking for, without adding any extra maintenace to the package.

                Basically it boils down to not lieing to yourself and understanding what the real use of the car is, not what you think you are using it for.

                Just as an example, I will use my Datsun 240Z. It is my "toy", I bought it knowing it was never going to be a true daily driver, even though when it is together I do drive it a LOT, but it is a car to play with, to push the limits on things, to modify, to have fun with and if it breaks, it goes in the garage to get fixed or upgraded and then look for the next part to break or upgrade. It has a 2.8L I6 in it, a 30 year old engine now, the design/engine family is over 40 years old. I decided to play with the engine that was in the car when I got it, and wanted a turbo again. I happened to have a turbo off a 6.5L diesel, and decided to use it. I can drive around all day and NEVER hit boost, even reving upwards of 2800 RPM, at less than about 30% throttle. But when I puch the loud pedal past 50% and rev upwards of 6000 RPM, there is that impressive torque increase and what the car is all about. This is sized so that I get all that top end power that I want, but would NEVER want this in a DD.

                Looking back at my '85 GMC Jimmy that I built with a 3.2L 660 V6, using some small port 3100 top end and a bunch of other mismatched parts, I used a T3 turbo from a 2.3 Ford Turbo Coupe, the turbo spooled by 1800 RPM, and was, if you ignored the lack of tune, fun to drive, but it started shoking about 4800 to 5000 RPM, even though I reved it higher on occasion. I never needed to, and most of the time I would only rev it about 2500 to 3000 RPM, and that was plenty for getting around town. I could also drive around without hitting boost with this vehicle, but I had to think about it and be very gentle on the pedal, I'd say less than 20% throttle, to not get into boost. Did I care? nope, I like boost and the way the boost came in when I was accelerating like a "normal" person, just driving along, it was very smooth and just nice to drive.
                The next engine for the truck, involves a slightly larger engine, and a pair of smaller turbos, because I want the bottom end torque increase, not that upper end power.

                So what is this long winded post getting at?...

                Be honest with yourself about how the vehicle will actually be used, and base your decision on what will benefit you most from dollars and time spent.
                werd
                -60v6's 2nd Jon M.
                91 Black Lumina Z34-5 speed
                92 Black Lumina Z34 5 speed (getting there, slowly... follow the progress here)
                94 Red Ford Ranger 2WD-5 speed
                Originally posted by Jay Leno
                Tires are cheap clutches...

                Comment

                Working...
                X