Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ported heads

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ported heads

    just some ported head questions. if i get ported heads would i need the 3500 valves or would stockers work? i already have springs so im good there. but idk if the bore will require the 3500 valves? and would i need a ported UIM and LIM for me to notice gains? or would i get good gains from just the heads?

    based on what most of you know about my setup so far..what would be a good bore to apply? like how big and what not.
    2002 Chevy Malibu 3400sfi - Project Sleeper - Good night

    Boost - Coming soon to a malibu near you.

  • #2
    3500 valves are lighter and flow a little better than 3400, but you could use 3400 valves no problem. Ported heads alone could be a nice increase, if ported well. Manifolds aren't necessary, but compliment the heads for the best performance increase.

    For bore, just as much as you need to clean up the cylinder walls IMO.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

    Comment


    • #3
      what are the size port you think would work well with my cam and a 65mm throttle body with 28lb injectors and S&S headers?
      2002 Chevy Malibu 3400sfi - Project Sleeper - Good night

      Boost - Coming soon to a malibu near you.

      Comment


      • #4
        what do you mean the size port?
        Ben
        60DegreeV6.com
        WOT-Tech.com

        Comment


        • #5
          i used the wrong word. milling wise..how big do you think i should go?
          2002 Chevy Malibu 3400sfi - Project Sleeper - Good night

          Boost - Coming soon to a malibu near you.

          Comment


          • #6
            How big? I still don't understand. What are you milling?
            Ben
            60DegreeV6.com
            WOT-Tech.com

            Comment


            • #7
              then i dont understand your listing for heads. whats the milling option about?

              2002 Chevy Malibu 3400sfi - Project Sleeper - Good night

              Boost - Coming soon to a malibu near you.

              Comment


              • #8
                Milling is for the surface of the head, usually to ensure it is flat against the block.
                -Brad-
                89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                sigpic
                Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bszopi View Post
                  Milling is for the surface of the head, usually to ensure it is flat against the block.
                  Or to raise compression....
                  Links:
                  WOT-Tech.com
                  FaceBook
                  Instagram

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You can't gain much compression from milling the aluminum heads though.
                    Ben
                    60DegreeV6.com
                    WOT-Tech.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by SappySE107 View Post
                      You can't gain much compression from milling the aluminum heads though.
                      yeah, this ain't the 60s with iron heads that have a massive amount of material just sitting there and lowering compression. i think the BBCs were all bad for that actually, with like 150+cc chambers...
                      1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
                      Latest nAst1 files here!
                      Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yea open chamber big block heads were 118CC and you could mill them down to 100 and even a little less sometimes.
                        1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
                        1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
                        Because... I am, CANADIAN

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Isn't the larger combustion chamber of the 3500 heads part of why they make more HP? I figured a larger CC is better, as lond as you have high-compression pistons to squish the A/F mixture. In theory, a larger quantity of air and fuel makes a bigger boom, right?
                          Just as an aside, milling my 3400 heads .020" got me maybe .3 increase in static compression.
                          Matt
                          2000 Oldsmobile Alero GLS sedan
                          3400/3500 hybrid, Diamond Racing forged pistons, Scat I-beams, TCE DRTC, ported heads, WOT Race cam, PAC 1518s, Manley valves, F40 6-speed with Quaife LSD

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            quantity of fuel is determined by displacement, not CC size/style(though there are exceptions to this rule)...

                            and the 3500 makes massive power above other 3x00s due to the massively improved flow. the bigger chamber offsets it a bit by lowering compression, but you would still come out ahead if you put 3500 heads on a 3400 block.
                            1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
                            Latest nAst1 files here!
                            Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              the 3500 chamber is bigger because it was just re-shaped a little, it's still very similar to the 3400. 32cc vs 28cc.
                              Past Builds;
                              1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                              1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                              Current Project;
                              1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X