thats the same thing mcgavin did with his Z26. totally not low profile and once you add a cowl or something around it your up to a half a foot.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Custom Intake Manifold
Collapse
X
-
sigpic
99 Grand Am GT
3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur 515 515 lift 112 lsa
15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come
-
someone has to make a single lower intake to mount the m62 too, not leaving the bottom intake and making a top one to mount the charger too.
Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U
Comment
-
not tryin to jack just really like the idea of this. wat is the ideal s/c to use. we all know a m62 isnt ideal. so m90? wat about other manufacturers? is there other options that might perform beter. the o/p seamed to want to talk about problems and best routes to make this happen. again not tryin to jack, just keep this goin.
Comment
-
6-71
Comment
-
Originally posted by kwhauck View Postwhipple, smallest design and most effecient..
Comment
-
the m90 is very easy to come accross, and cheap, i picked one up for $20 at bucks. it was missing the all the sensors and BOV/BPV, but what ever, its for mock up. plus different length snouts are avalible and pullies. lots of suppourt for them, where as a vortec s/c is more pricey, startingaround $1200, but maybe easier to mount as you wont need to make a manifold for it to sit on.
Its runs!!!>>>Aint No 60* Sound Like Mehttp://youtu.be/YKEmNwa141U
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertisaar View Postmost efficient roots type blower, but that's not saying much..
my 1600ax lysholm blower will outflow an m112 and is more convenient in a much smaller case...
except for the new TVS blower, roots are overrated, and with the new TVS blowers they are ridiculously expensive...
S...........L...........E...........E...........P...........E...........R
Comment
-
I haven't even thought about mine at all lately. Too many other things going on. But, to answer your previous post's questions, for the water passages, I planned on using tubing to tie the 2 side together, where the stock manifold has cast water passages. Somewhere in there would be a thermostat housing as well...-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
Comment
-
I have looked at this several times and to me it seems the original LIM design complicates making a new LIM. It's fairly easy to point out what doesn't work out well for this application, the obvious cross flowing ports, the fuel rail, injectors, and coolant line running through the valley all need to be dealt with. The coolant line can be easily rerouted. New injector bosses can be tapped into the runners of a new manifold after the air routing has been figured out. The cross flow of the original LIM . . . If you use a production LIM as a base then it will reduce how far the charger can go down in the valley. The whole point is to make this fit under a standard FWD hood, and even blowing out the top half of the runners still leaves a couple inches where the ports run below the valley cover where the injector bosses are located. If you could make a base that goes flat from port to port on the intake ports in the head, the charger could be bolted just above the top of the intake port in the head. That would put the bottom of the charger a bit below the valley cover to the stock LIM. If you could make the port shapes wider and flatter till they reach the port then you might be able to squeeze it down a bit more.
Originally posted by gar70614 View Posta m90 might be a little big but wat if u put the s/c upside down because they can be put in any direction (refering to pic above) under the steel runners with a box above it with all the runners going to it. so the injectors could stay put but it would be a little tall. i dont know much about boost but puttin in my 2 cents.
You could perhaps put it in there at sort of an angle, aim the flow to a central manifold along side/above the charger and then equal runners to the ports. Slightly less clearance but could probably be pulled off to fit stock heads without major machining.
Originally posted by bszopi View PostI haven't even thought about mine at all lately. Too many other things going on. But, to answer your previous post's questions, for the water passages, I planned on using tubing to tie the 2 side together, where the stock manifold has cast water passages. Somewhere in there would be a thermostat housing as well...
Originally posted by kwhauck View Posti think I may start with a 3500 LIM and saw and see what I come up with...
Comment
-
nice that would be cool if that could be easily duplicated for our application.
if you could easily duplicate that i would be interested.sigpic
99 Grand Am GT
3400/3500 -Solid trans mount--TCE 65mm T-body---85mm LS2 maf---1 1/4' TCE intake spacers with 3400 upper--SLP Catback with flowmaster 80--TOG headers
Modded 3400 lifters with LT1 springs---Comp Cams 26986 Springs
1357 cam 227 233 .050 dur 515 515 lift 112 lsa
15.232@88.85mph on stock 3400---New time to come
Comment
Comment