Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Exhaust Mods

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Exhaust Mods

    Vehicle:
    2005 Chevrolet Impala

    Engine:
    3400 LA1

    Mods:
    180 Theromostat
    200A High Output Alternator
    8mm AC Delco Ignition Wires
    Custom FWI CAI: 2.5" piping to K&N Filter
    EGR Delete
    MMS PCM

    Mods to come (all head work):
    Light Polishing on Intake Ports, Heavy Polishing on Exhaust ports
    3500 Valves


    Current Exhaust setup:
    Currently, 2.25" Pipe from Stock Exhaust Manifold to Mufflers, Cat Delete, U-Bend Delete, and Resonator Delete. Was single muffler when I bought it. Replaced with Flow Master 44 2.5" In/Out and the one day I got off to have the Y added and second muffler they were out of Flow Masters and they talked me into an IMCO. Sounds pretty good, inside and outside looks exactly like a Flow Master, Also 2.5" In/Out.

    Problem:
    Too much Low End loss with Resonator Delete. Too much High end loss with Magnaflow Resonator.

    Misc:
    Stock Sweet spot was 3-4.5K, but still have some more pull off the line. Currently it will start to pick up around 3k, but is best at 4-5.5K

    I got the stock resonator replaced because when I did the cat delete I got a little bit of rasp. The Magnaflow removed the rasp and I Loved the sound it gave. At idle, perfect deep tone, and when you pushed on it, it was just loud enough to know you're there.

    I no longer have the stock resonator to go back on.

    My Objective is to keep the High End, but bring the Low end back. I can deal with what ever the sound if I can get the performance I want, however I would like to use the Magnaflow.

    The Magnaflow is 3" In/Out - I was thinking about going to a 3" Down Pipe, and 3" to the mufflers and putting the Magnaflow back in. What do yall think about this?

    I am more than open to other ideas $300 and less.

  • #2
    3" exhaust for your current mods is WAAAAY to big. There are guys pushing close to 300hp that don't use a 3" exhaust. I would do a 2.5" all the way back to the mufflers. The downpipe is a huge restriction on these things, so a 2.5", mandrel bent downpipe will help out tremendously.
    -Brad-
    89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
    sigpic
    Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by bszopi View Post
      3" exhaust for your current mods is WAAAAY to big. There are guys pushing close to 300hp that don't use a 3" exhaust. I would do a 2.5" all the way back to the mufflers. The downpipe is a huge restriction on these things, so a 2.5", mandrel bent downpipe will help out tremendously.
      X2, thats likely where all the power is disappearing due to the exhaust slowing down too much. hell, my el camino(355/jumbo cam) has 3" exhaust(true duals) and sometimes i think thats too large
      1995 Monte Carlo LS 3100, 4T60E...for now, future plans include driving it until the wheels fall off!
      Latest nAst1 files here!
      Need a wiring diagram for any GM car or truck from 82-06(and 07-08 cars)? PM me!

      Comment


      • #4
        Swap to a set of "header style" manifolds from a '04 3500 Malibu, run 2" pipes off those merged into a 2.5" mandrel bent system. More than enough flow.


        2.5" exhaust is good for up to around 300 crank HP, any more than that and 3" single or going to true duals is needed.
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Superdave View Post
          Swap to a set of "header style" manifolds from a '04 3500 Malibu, run 2" pipes off those merged into a 2.5" mandrel bent system. More than enough flow.


          2.5" exhaust is good for up to around 300 crank HP, any more than that and 3" single or going to true duals is needed.
          I have not seen a 3500 installed a vehicle. On the Malibu are they actually "Header style" or do I cap off the Rear and run the pipe in place of the Cross Over?

          Comment


          • #6
            They are like shorty block hugger headers basically. dual exhaust with short runners. They do not connect on the engine, they merge under the car to a Y pipe back into one pipe.
            sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
            1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
            16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
            Original L82 Longblock
            with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
            Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

            Comment


            • #7
              Yep, on the Malibu they merge under the car but it is possible to have the front one crossover the trans like the stock setup does.
              Past Builds;
              1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
              1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
              Current Project;
              1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

              Comment


              • #8
                Did all the 2004 Malibu's have the "header style" exhaust manifolds?
                Last edited by Khipset; 05-13-2009, 12:42 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Khipset View Post
                  Did all the 2004 Malibu's have the "header style" exhaust manifolds?
                  If it had a 3500 then yes.


                  The only problem is that in the Malibu the cats mount right below the manifolds, so if you have a good yard they can cut the flanges off the cats, if not then i think Forced_firebird was selling flanges that bolt up to the 3500 manifolds (or you could have some made).


                  It's a fairly simple 3 bolt flange.
                  Past Builds;
                  1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                  1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                  Current Project;
                  1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There aren't any decent yards around here that have 99 or newer vehicles that I know of. I was looking online at car-parts.com for them but unfortunately they don't have pictures.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X