lower dogbone mounts RSM vs. FFP

[extremeskiier728]

This ones pretty simple which would yield better results a RSM Racing lower dogbone mount or A Fast forward performance lower dogbone? The application is an 95 N body 3100. any thoughts anyone have either?

[mihela816]

I don't think they really have any advantage over each other, but they are superior to stock mounts.

[J.Mo60]

What exactly does the dogbone help? why is it better than stock? just curious......

[Cliff8928]

The "dogbone" is officially called a Torque Strut. It helps control the rotational movement of the engine.

Going on RSM's track record, the FFP one is most likely better, but i don't have experience with either.


Cliff Scott
89 BerettaGT
89 Volvo740

[Jon89LE]

I went with RSMs dogbone on my 3.1 since it had the spot for a bolt to hold the motor forward like the stock ones do. The FFP billet ones from what i saw didnt.

[extremeskiier728]

thats cool the FFD torque strut looks beefier than the RSM. and in response to jon89le for my application it is just the two bushings and a rod basically

[Jon89LE]

and in response to jon89le for my application it is just the two bushings and a rod basically

Im lost. Were you refering to the RSM ones? And for your application, do you mean like a car aside from my GP?

[extremeskiier728]

im saying for my car an Nbody 3100 the torque strut (stock, RSM, FFP) is only the 2 bushing and one solid straight piece.

[extremeskiier728]

anyone else got some input