i did not mean that part in the gm manual. i was talking about people saying the truck coils will give you more HP. that part is. i believe there is a reason he specified the truck coils instead of just saying LS coils. and like i said if you believe that you need that much, then why not switch to the 10 plus box. it IS boosted. gm doesnt make an engine that is meant for this much boost from the factory. plus they dont make the multiple CD coils/system stock, but everyone claims there are gains from it too. a waste spark will never be the same amount because it is reversed in polarity. thats just how it is. i have measured the systems, there is not much of a difference, and they have somewhat of a cool down period too because the reverse polarity is not as intense of a wave, making less output, and not causing the coil to heat up as much on the secondary winding of the coil side that producing the waste spark. if the gm system could not be improved upon, msd would not be in business, nor would accell, holley, or any of the others.
there is no taking a chance with gm, but you are putting alot of faith in them on something that was def not their idea. honestly the gm system has been tested on the LS engines to well at 1000 HP, but that is not uncommon for the LS engines really. after that, you have to go to better stuff. still using the theory behind it per se, but then again, i highly doubt it was gms idea in teh first place.
i highly doubt that it takes anything away due to the 2 poles of the coil. if they branched off a single terminal i could see that, but they are not related on the secondary side. they both should produce the same voltage if the same length of wire is used because it is only the weakness of the primary voltage or the weakness of the individual secondary coil on that single terminal that will change the output. they are all the same on the output though.
i can say as i have personally seen this with a DSO. I had the secondary coil on half of the coil going bad. it was the 3-6 coil. cyl 6 was up at 30k or so with no problems. the 3 pole was at the same height almost all of the time, but it did show glitches in the field collapsing and the end lead to the dwell time. they all produced the same across the board. the only reason i could tell what was wrong was the DSO. Otherwise it would have gotten worse and i would not have known. but that shows that both of the poles on a single coil are not related.
there is no taking a chance with gm, but you are putting alot of faith in them on something that was def not their idea. honestly the gm system has been tested on the LS engines to well at 1000 HP, but that is not uncommon for the LS engines really. after that, you have to go to better stuff. still using the theory behind it per se, but then again, i highly doubt it was gms idea in teh first place.
i highly doubt that it takes anything away due to the 2 poles of the coil. if they branched off a single terminal i could see that, but they are not related on the secondary side. they both should produce the same voltage if the same length of wire is used because it is only the weakness of the primary voltage or the weakness of the individual secondary coil on that single terminal that will change the output. they are all the same on the output though.
i can say as i have personally seen this with a DSO. I had the secondary coil on half of the coil going bad. it was the 3-6 coil. cyl 6 was up at 30k or so with no problems. the 3 pole was at the same height almost all of the time, but it did show glitches in the field collapsing and the end lead to the dwell time. they all produced the same across the board. the only reason i could tell what was wrong was the DSO. Otherwise it would have gotten worse and i would not have known. but that shows that both of the poles on a single coil are not related.
Comment