initial dyno comparison but I don't think its tuned right now judging form the dyno sheet and AF. About 10 whp gain and 7 foot pounds of torque from the numbers I caught. The pics are a bit big and the rpm range isn't the same between runs and the owner will be dynoing again after the ECM has had time to learn again.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ported 3500 heads/manifolds on a G6
Collapse
X
-
Ported 3500 heads/manifolds on a G6
initial dyno comparison but I don't think its tuned right now judging form the dyno sheet and AF. About 10 whp gain and 7 foot pounds of torque from the numbers I caught. The pics are a bit big and the rpm range isn't the same between runs and the owner will be dynoing again after the ECM has had time to learn again.Ben
60DegreeV6.com
WOT-Tech.comTags: None
-
Good work, a 10 HP gain on the dyno with out tuning for the mods is impressive.
It would have been interesting to see if there was any KR present during the runs.....2000 Grand Am GT
2011 Chevy Impala
"The world's best cam combined with a poor set of heads will produce an engine that's a dog. But bolt on a set of great heads even with a poor cam, and that engine will still make great power." ~John Lingenfelter
-
from what I have been told, yes 1.0 would be 68 degrees F, 0 feet elevation and no humidity. 1.03 sounds reasonable considering I was told every point was a lot t (1.1). If you don't know the correction factor, then the dyno operator could have used a higher factor to make the engine seem more powerful than it really is.Ben
60DegreeV6.com
WOT-Tech.com
Comment
Comment