Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WOT Spark Advance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I see about 26-28 on premium at WOT, I planned on testing out a bit higher. I run up to 42 in other places though.
    SpudFiles
    Blast vegetables and whatever else you can think of!
    Theopia
    Enjoy life online.

    1996 3500GP Coupe, "Bright White".
    3500 swap, 60degreeV6 1393 Cam, Ported Intakes, Comp Cams Valve Springs, 65mm TB, Custom Pushrods, S&S Headers, 97 PCM with DHP Powrtuner, 2.5" back to dual Hooker Aerochambers, SS Brake Lines, Addco swaybar, KYB's, Intrax Springs, STB's, etc!

    Comment


    • #17
      I haven't gotten into my timing table yet, but I'm planning on getting an EGT gauge before I do. It's my understanding that EGT's are greatly affected by timing changes. Sometimes you can have good AFR's, add timing and not get any knock, but not greatly affect your peak power either and end up increasing EGT's. The biggest thing I will be looking for with timing changes will be low end torque and engine response. If I can increase peak HP without raising combustion temps too much thats great, but I doubt I will be able to do much in the high rpm range without an intercooler or methanol/water injection.
      '97 Grand Prix GT 3800 (sold)
      '00 Grand Am GT 3400 supercharged
      13.788 @ 103.73 mph, 320whp 300 ft/lbs
      Gotta love boost!

      Comment


      • #18
        for my mostly stock 3.1 i'm running the 180 stat, 91 premium, and 30*. on a hot day 85+ i'll get 1-3 KR in 3rd (old tranny) at around 90 MPH.
        Andy

        sigpic

        fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
        fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

        62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by z284pwr View Post
          I know this is an entirely different setup, but I run 30-40* on a stock 3.1 with a Haltech E6k with no problem at all. The weird thing is I couldn't feel any difference between 20 and 35-40? Maybe the 3rd GEN motors respond better?
          i guess we'll find out soon, with the "A" that is....

          Comment


          • #20
            im trying to follow this here a bit... when does combustion typically begin? or is that variable with throttle position? I'm thinking it is... but when you all talk about 20 or 30 whatever degrees, are you talking about when you want combustion to be at it's peak?

            Comment


            • #21
              total timing at WOT is adjusted to 30 degrees before top dead center. that's when combustion begins. combustion at it's peak pressures = a crap ton of force, but = detonation or preignition occurs if the combustion event happens to soon.
              Andy

              sigpic

              fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
              fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

              62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

              Comment


              • #22
                I guess this would be as good a place as any to ask this one....which would definintely throw off actual timing for the Haltech guys....

                Does anyone know the angle the crank trigger is at BTDC?
                Brian Edwards
                '73 Trans-Am
                '79 Suburban
                '90 Beretta INDY
                '90 Turbo Grand Prix
                '04 TSX
                '04 TL

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by z284pwr View Post
                  I guess this would be as good a place as any to ask this one....which would definintely throw off actual timing for the Haltech guys....

                  Does anyone know the angle the crank trigger is at BTDC?

                  i did reading and the FSM said " each notch is 60* apart, and the reference notch 10*, this being after #2 ignition signal".

                  also, did you mean BDC? or TDC?

                  Comment


                  • #24






                    Any of those help out?
                    -Brad-
                    89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                    sigpic
                    Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by bszopi View Post
                      [/img]http://60degreev6.com/forum/gallery/files/5/5/7/1/crank_trigger_Model.jpg[/img]

                      [/img]http://60degreev6.com/forum/gallery/files/5/5/7/1/crank_trigger_Layout1_001.jpg[/img]

                      [/img]http://60degreev6.com/forum/gallery/files/5/5/7/1/crank_trigger_Layout1.jpg[/img]

                      Any of those help out?
                      I think I'll just stick with what I have after the pictures, so yeah, they helped.

                      i did reading and the FSM said " each notch is 60* apart, and the reference notch 10*, this being after #2 ignition signal".

                      also, did you mean BDC? or TDC?
                      I'm going to stick with the 60*. The Haltech wants "Trigger in Angle - °BTDC " (Before Top Dead Center)

                      When I first setup my Haltech, I was told 70°, then I have found another person that has suggested 67° and I have 60°.

                      I'm mainly curious because my EGTs have risen quite a bit between the Haltech and the original ECU even though I have the timing programmed to within a degree of each other right now. This had me thinking the trigger degree setting was wrong so the timing wasn't exact.
                      Brian Edwards
                      '73 Trans-Am
                      '79 Suburban
                      '90 Beretta INDY
                      '90 Turbo Grand Prix
                      '04 TSX
                      '04 TL

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        59.8 degrees is the spark referance angle for the 60 degree V6 using a 7x trigger
                        Past Builds;
                        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                        Current Project;
                        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Later this summer I'll be spending a day on a dyno with my car trying to find the best spark advance for all driving conditions. Hopefully owning a WB O2 now, it'll be the only thing I have to tune for on the dyno.
                          I may own a GTO now, but I'm still a 60V6er at heart.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            thats interesting, mathematically that very well could be the problem

                            Originally posted by z284pwr View Post
                            I think I'll just stick with what I have after the pictures, so yeah, they helped.



                            I'm going to stick with the 60*. The Haltech wants "Trigger in Angle - °BTDC " (Before Top Dead Center)

                            When I first setup my Haltech, I was told 70°, then I have found another person that has suggested 67° and I have 60°.

                            I'm mainly curious because my EGTs have risen quite a bit between the Haltech and the original ECU even though I have the timing programmed to within a degree of each other right now. This had me thinking the trigger degree setting was wrong so the timing wasn't exact.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X