Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Increase 3500 compression without changing pistons

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Increase 3500 compression without changing pistons

    How much can the compression be increased without changing pistons? I've been reading for quite some time, and I can't seem to find exactly what I want to know. Can 0.040" gaskets be used? Are they available in a 3.8" bore without getting into something custom? Or is there not enough piston to head clearance? I tried using the CR calc, but I can't for the life of me find an exact number for the dish volume of the 3500 piston. But from what I could see, if the heads could be milled 0.020", and a 0.040" headgasket used, it should bump the compression up to about 10.8 correct? And then what about piston to valve clearance?

  • #2
    Yes you can shave the heads .020 to gain a little SCR but you will lose .020" of clearance to the pistons
    No, you cannot use .040 gaskets
    3500 pistons pop out right about .020"
    Piston to valve clearance shouldn't be a problem unless you are running a large cam.

    search for posts made by me for some carnage pics of piston to valve clearance problems.
    Last edited by Superdave; 02-19-2008, 11:44 PM.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Superdave View Post
      Yes you can shave the heads .020 to gain a little SCR but you will lose .020" of clearance to the pistons
      No, you cannot use .040 gaskets
      3500 pistons pop out right about .020"
      Piston to valve clearance shouldn't be a problem unless you are running a large cam.

      search for posts made by me for some carnage pics of piston to valve clearance problems.
      I can't agree more. When I measure the 3.4 pistons (.0095") I could hardly believe that GM had a .0305" quench - guess it didn't matter when the engine died at 5500RPM, lol.
      Links:
      WOT-Tech.com
      FaceBook
      Instagram

      Comment


      • #4
        So, would it be possible then, to shave 0.020" off the pistons, and then use a 0.040" gasket?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Superdave View Post
          Yes you can shave the heads .020 to gain a little SCR but you will lose .020" of clearance to the pistons
          No, you cannot use .040 gaskets
          3500 pistons pop out right about .020"
          Piston to valve clearance shouldn't be a problem unless you are running a large cam.

          search for posts made by me for some carnage pics of piston to valve clearance problems.
          didnt the valves hit the pistons cuz of the rod seeing 7k alot?
          [SIGPIC]
          12.268@117... 11's to come!
          turbo 3400: 358whp and 365tq at 9 psi
          ASE Master Technician. GM Certified.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ibU1k8UZoo
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUqJyopd720

          Comment


          • #6
            You aren't going to see an increase in compression (well, maybe a fraction of a percent) if you shave the pistons just to use a thinner gasket. The only increase you will see is from a now very slightly smaller piston dish volume.
            -Brad-
            89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
            sigpic
            Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MidnightriderZ24 View Post
              didnt the valves hit the pistons cuz of the rod seeing 7k alot?
              Don't forget the 238* duration on the cam

              I'm trying 236* and have more clearance with .0095" pistons/.060" gaskets.
              Links:
              WOT-Tech.com
              FaceBook
              Instagram

              Comment


              • #8
                dunno.. but this year i'll be running .060 gaskets with my pre-clearanced pistons and hopefully a nice double roller timing set.
                Past Builds;
                1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                Current Project;
                1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                Comment


                • #9
                  I just wanted to say, that shaving the heads .020 doesn't give you less clearance between the piston and head. its the valve clearance, which really shouldn't be a problem.

                  Swap to 3400 heads if you want compression.
                  Ben
                  60DegreeV6.com
                  WOT-Tech.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SappySE107 View Post
                    I just wanted to say, that shaving the heads .020 doesn't give you less clearance between the piston and head. its the valve clearance, which really shouldn't be a problem.

                    Swap to 3400 heads if you want compression.
                    That's what i ment..

                    Damn you Captn Morgan!
                    Past Builds;
                    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                    Current Project;
                    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X