The block and oil pan will need to be clearanced slightly in order for the rod ends to have free movement throughout the entire stroke. On the 3500 block, there are ~1/8" notches at each rod location on both the block and oil pan.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
crank work ?
Collapse
X
-
-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
-
i e-mailed flatlander racing today about there strokers and they said that it would probly take custom rods and pistons to make it work
and then i e-mailed JBP to find out what they would say about a stroker build and they say that they use stock style pistons and rods
what do you guys think about that ?01 olds shilluette 3400/4T65-E stock for now
Comment
-
Originally posted by montess408 View Posti e-mailed flatlander racing today about there strokers and they said that it would probly take custom rods and pistons to make it work
and then i e-mailed JBP to find out what they would say about a stroker build and they say that they use stock style pistons and rods
what do you guys think about that ?
Pay flat lander $200 to offset grind a 3500 crank, or $425 to add metal and offset grind to a .200 increase so you can use the 5.7" rod in place of the 5.9" and use the same pistons and have yourself a baby stump puller at about 3.7L.
Today I discovered a possible forged production piston for the 3900. The LS1 has the same bore diameter and once you subtract the difference in rod lengths using the shorter LS1 6.098" rod and the difference in stroke .31" using the 3900 5.9" rod and stroke, the LS1 combo drops in the bore from the 9.24" LS1 deck ht, to roughly the 8.82" 3900 deck height provided it is the same as the 2.8L. You would only need to weigh the pistons to assess balance which would be easy since they are floating. Best price ea is about $80 so far through Wiseco and valve reliefs would need to be cut.
The 305 piston is the closest I could find to the 3500 but it would require more work. On the shelf parts are always better than custom in my opinion, especially since everybody wants to sell you special rings with the custom pistons pushing the final cost closer to $800 or more or $1000 if you get a spare. When I blow up a stock piston, I'll start looking into custom, but as long as stock 3800s are doing this on powder metal rods and cast pistons:
I'll take my chances.
LS1 347 piston possibility for the 3900
Comment
-
well thats what i wanted to do grind the crank .250 over and bore .040 to make a 3.7 L displacement so i can use stock rod and stock pistons then right ?
so if 3800 are puting that good of numbers on cast pistons then a good set of hypertec pistons should be fine then i would think ?01 olds shilluette 3400/4T65-E stock for now
Comment
-
Originally posted by montess408 View Postwell thats what i wanted to do grind the crank .250 over and bore .040 to make a 3.7 L displacement so i can use stock rod and stock pistons then right ?
so if 3800 are puting that good of numbers on cast pistons then a good set of hypertec pistons should be fine then i would think ?
In retrospect, if you are using a 3400 block I would strongly advise you to start with a 3500
Comment
-
yeah i was going to use a 3400 block a guy i know made a 3.7 out of a 3400 that i saw so i wanted to do the same thats why i ask on how it's made becaus where i saw it he does not really specify and block specs just that its a 3400 bored and stroked to 3.701 olds shilluette 3400/4T65-E stock for now
Comment
-
This has already been discussed here. Good read for a rehash on offset grinding.
Last edited by Monzsta; 02-23-2008, 12:54 AM.
Comment
-
and now you know where i got my compression numbers
Comment
-
Originally posted by montess408 View Postnice tread but i still dont have the yes or no anser that i am looking for i anm not to good with all this math part of a build so can i stroke my 3400 crank .250 and still use stock 3400 rods and 3.4 camaro pistons ?
I'm guestimating that you would be much better off particularly expense and durability wise if you start with a 3500. You are really pushing the limits I believe by trying to massage a 3400 to 3.7L. I would be more understanding if the 3500 was a larger engine dimension wise but since it takes up the same space I would spend the block bore and piston money on the 3500 and stroke the crank to the proper length necessary to use the 5.7 rods with the stock 3500 pistons. Give it some thought
Comment
-
Originally posted by montess408 View Postnice tread but i still dont have the yes or no anser that i am looking for i anm not to good with all this math part of a build so can i stroke my 3400 crank .250 and still use stock 3400 rods and 3.4 camaro pistons ?
Comment
-
and on top of that your looking at more money for the crank trigger to convert the 3500 crank to one that can be used... and notching the block just to use the STOCK 3500 crank and rods... to be honest im not even sure there is enough room with the 3400 to go that large with the stroke, oh and dont forget you'll need to figure out something for the oil pan aswell
in the end your prolly looking at the same or more to stroke your 3400 than to just go with a 3500, and now you know why i bought mine... so far ive got $100 into it after selling the pistons and rods, not bad for a 30k mile block, crank, cam and timing cover... cam and timing cover will be sold aswell though so we'll see what this really ends up costing me!!
Comment
-
i am not going to use the 3500 crank i want to use the 3400 and get flatlanders to do me a welded stroker i just need to know whats the max stroke i can get with stock length rod and stock style pistons ?
i was talking to jbp on a stroker build and they told me it would be 3000$ for the short block
but they start with there forged crank witch is 1500$ so thats why i am asking for the stroke if i can machine my crank for 450 $ and then get them to do the rest i will save some
$$$ but they did not tell me the bore & stroke numbersLast edited by montess408; 02-27-2008, 12:06 PM.01 olds shilluette 3400/4T65-E stock for now
Comment
Comment