Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Test: 3500 crank in 3.4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Test: 3500 crank in 3.4

    I put a 3500 crank in my 3.4, but didn't take the time to press out the wristpins on the 3500 pistons. Instead I bolted the rod on the crank with the piston sticking out the bottom, lol. Since the rod cap and the heads of the bolts measured almost the same distance from the bearing, then I felt it was a productive test (actually the nut side of the bolt was a little further).

    The idea is to check clearances for stroking a Gen1 block. Since the 3500 and Gen 1 rods have the same thickness caps, I feel that if a 3500 rod made it around, then a stroked 3.4 rod would also clear. There was only one spot that the rod bolt hit the block, and that was only if I turned the rod on the crank in such a way that would never happen with a piston in the bore.

    Since we know the 3500 has plenty of clearance, and that's the next motor going in my car, stroking is a serious consideration. I know for the average person, this might get out of budget really fast, but having a machine shop makes it feasable for me to try. The only part I think I will have to sub out is the final grind on the rod journals.

    Also I was going to measure the rod pins on both the 3.4 and 3500, but didn't have a caliper handy that was thin enough to get between the rod and piston (also was wanting to get the crank and bearings installed today on my block), but I have plenty of extar rods with pistons on to measure later.

    Here's pics...



    Links:
    WOT-Tech.com
    FaceBook
    Instagram

  • #2
    Keep it up man............looks like your on to something there. Thanks for sharing.

    Comment


    • #3
      is that a forged crank? looks almost cast to me. arnt the newer cranks forged?
      '86 Grand National

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 34blazer View Post
        is that a forged crank? looks almost cast to me. arnt the newer cranks forged?
        It appears that it is drop forged, then billet machined. Close up, all the journal and throw areas are machined on this crank whereas a cast crank only has machining near the journals.
        Links:
        WOT-Tech.com
        FaceBook
        Instagram

        Comment


        • #5
          Look at the counterweight up close...

          Links:
          WOT-Tech.com
          FaceBook
          Instagram

          Comment


          • #6
            How much material has to be removed from the block to make the crank work?
            00 Grand Prix GTP Daytona

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 2.8RS View Post
              How much material has to be removed from the block to make the crank work?
              Re-read the first post - I think it's going to clear. Wanted to get the 3.4 crank bolted in the block tonight, so it was just thrown in to see. When the 3.1 comes out of the Firebird, I'll press a pin out of a 3500 rod and see if it clears properly. Today I just bolted a rod on there with the piston sticking out the bottom. If anything it will have more clearance when bolted in properly because the threaded side of the rod bolt sticks out further then the head side.
              Links:
              WOT-Tech.com
              FaceBook
              Instagram

              Comment


              • #8
                My brain is fried from studying for finals. What rods are you using, I know that whatever pistons are used they have to be milled a little from the top to clear the heads and they stick out too far. I can't really even think I'm so tired.
                00 Grand Prix GTP Daytona

                Comment


                • #9
                  Go look at your 3500 block and you will see the areas that are clearanced for the rods. Its minimal, but I still think it's significant enough to be required. And if you look at the oil pan, it also has notches for clearance.
                  -Brad-
                  89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
                  sigpic
                  Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I really don't think these cranks are forged. I have been trying to get a pic of a junk crank for a while but GM is funny about that stuff. I have seen these cranks partially machined, when they find something wrong with them during the machining process they are sent back to Defiance foundry to be recyled. I have seen cast cranks partially machined like the one pictured. I also have the misfortune of looking at fully machined blocks ready to be remelted, something simple like a air bubble on the oil pan surface(porosity). Brand new fully or partially machined blocks and cranks from Romulus, Flint and Tonowanda destined for the smelter. There may be some forged cranks out there but not all. Shoot me a casting number from this crank and I will compare it to raw cast cranks.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      i thought it was determined that some of the new cranks are not forged, but rather, cast steel, instead of cast iron? not forged but still stronger?

                      Cammed 3400 --> 224whp 210wtq
                      Cammed 3500 --> ???
                      1 of 5 3500 J-Bodies

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RedBird View Post
                        i thought it was determined that some of the new cranks are not forged, but rather, cast steel, instead of cast iron? not forged but still stronger?
                        According to some, GM has been using cast steel for years on all the cranks. Cast iron hasn't been used for ages.

                        The 7484 has been deemed a forging. http://60degreev6.com/showthread.php...ed+steel+crank

                        I work in a machine shop and this crank appears to me to be drop forged close to size and machined the rest of the way.

                        Brad, I'll have to try the hammer trick.
                        Last edited by ForcedFirebird; 12-16-2007, 10:43 AM.
                        Links:
                        WOT-Tech.com
                        FaceBook
                        Instagram

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                          Brad, I'll have to try the hammer trick.
                          Yep...if it rings like a bell...its steel.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by zofo61 View Post
                            Yep...if it rings like a bell...its steel.
                            If it's true that GM ghas been using cast steel, then it wouldn't work, but I'm still going to try.
                            Links:
                            WOT-Tech.com
                            FaceBook
                            Instagram

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              i thought it was forged pieces make the ring and cast parts make a clunk
                              '86 Grand National

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X