If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
proceed to the Forums area and select the forum that you want to visit.
awww shit. My brain just had a thought. IT BURNS!!!!!!!!!!
Taylor
1988 Olds Cutlass Supreme 3100 MPFI
1990 Pontiac Grand Prix STE 3.1 MPFI
1994 Olds Cutlass Supreme convertible
1998 Lincoln Mark VIII
"find something simple and complicate it"
lol, that's New Mexico.. Albuquerque is my home town. Maybe next time i go back i'll snap a ton of pics for you guys. I've seen that engine before.. it's purdy.
so, without power numbers at what rpm, and the fact it's only had preliminary testing--no long term testing for reliability or any track time...just how does this "concept engine" prove that the 3x00's are strong, reliable, and have a lot of potential to make power?? just cause it has straight out headers to twin turbos doesn't mean it'll make 600HP or hold up for a long time. i love the idea though..
so, without power numbers at what rpm, and the fact it's only had preliminary testing--no long term testing for reliability or any track time...just how does this "concept engine" prove that the 3x00's are strong, reliable, and have a lot of potential to make power?? just cause it has straight out headers to twin turbos doesn't mean it'll make 600HP or hold up for a long time. i love the idea though..
Wel.. I think the fact that Mr. Falconer even bothered to prep and reeengineer the engine in the first place should mean something. BTW there are a number of people running them as marine engines pushing them a hell of alot harder than any of us.....FYI these engines have similar dimensions compared to an SBC only metric. With proper machining, balancing and tuning I see no reason why the power couldn't be handled.
Comment