Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will I be running too lean?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    glad to see you'll be converting!! you absoultly will happy that you did!

    great link. was looking for something like that. though i wouldn't say it's a myth per say, however, while it's not tuned for the best operation, it still will be able to run the car with out killing something unless you go crazy like Dave did! not saying i disagree with you, but i feel there is much more flexibility in the MAF system over a MAP.
    Andy

    sigpic

    fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
    fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

    62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

    Comment


    • #17
      hehehe....


      Yah, keep the duration lower than mine.. 293 advertised is a bit much.
      Past Builds;
      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
      Current Project;
      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by torq455 View Post
        glad to see you'll be converting!! you absoultly will happy that you did!

        great link. was looking for something like that. though i wouldn't say it's a myth per say, however, while it's not tuned for the best operation, it still will be able to run the car with out killing something unless you go crazy like Dave did! not saying i disagree with you, but i feel there is much more flexibility in the MAF system over a MAP.
        True, but I think its more due to OBDII than just a MAF. OBDII has more flexibility in trying to keep the engine running right vs. OBDI. Reliability / economy / emissions were major concerns with OBDII while performance was more of an afterthought.
        Your local OBDII moderator

        2000 Grand Am GT w/ WOT parts

        Comment


        • #19
          19Cutlass94: good deal. Even with the stock motor if you can tune you can usually pick up power. No two motors are the same from the factory, so even custom tuning a stock motor can be beneficial. If you get the pin-outs you may be able to just swap the engine harness and not the interior harness like us L bodies can. You just gotta swap some wires around for the tach signal and such.

          95Grandam - If I were you I'd just put on the large port 3100 or 3400 intakes and run with that. Make sure to keep using the original 3100 FPR and injectors still though. Those small ports are costing you at least 10hp if not more. The 3500 heads flow more but you'll be getting pretty far from the parameters of the stock 3100/computer so likely that won't gain you a whole lot for the cost. And a cam will screw things up too much up. Go with large port manifolds and then a 3500 upper if you wish and you should get some increases but anymore than that I think it will be not worth it until you can tune. You're wanting to do the same thing as the this thread is talking about. Since you can't tune (94/95) you're in the same boat.
          sigpic New 2010 project (click image)
          1994 3100 BERETTA. 200,000+ miles
          16.0 1/4 mile when stock. Now ???
          Original L82 Longblock
          with LA1, LX9, LX5 parts
          Manifold-back 2.5" SS Mandrel Exhaust. Hardware is SS too.

          Comment

          Working...
          X