Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3.4 stroker crank

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 3.4 stroker crank



    Just ran across that, found it interesting. Probably kills the rod/stroke ratio though.

    Just guessing roughly at the stroke, its around a 1.4 to 1.5 rod ratio.

  • #2
    Im sure the rod stroke ratio is gonna be ass without custom pistons and rods. Thanks for the link, you should post it on the site news, it may help them get some feedback to make it.
    Ben
    60DegreeV6.com
    WOT-Tech.com

    Comment


    • #3
      im gonna be keepin my eye on that thread
      3.4L camaro some goodies

      Comment


      • #4
        ???
        1992 Chevrolet S10
        2.8 v6 tbi 5 speed

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by 614streets
          ???
          why the "???"

          however that would have to involve some serious block clearancing wouldnt it? i really dont think we have what .6 (i figured it out last night) more stroke
          3.4L camaro some goodies

          Comment


          • #6
            Actually, the 1.4 rod ratio i was still calculating using 5.7" rods. Oops.

            Using shorter rods like you would have to is a 1.2 ratio, which i don't think is even on the charts. What would using such an extreme ratio do?

            Comment


            • #7
              Brian, what bore/stroke/rod numbers are you using? I figured with a 1mm overbore (to 93mm), using a 98mm stroke, and a 5.4 inch rod (to keep stockpistons), you get 4L displacement and a rod/stroke ratio of 1.40:1. Using a 103 mm stroke, and a 5.33" rod yields 4.2L, and a rod/stroke ratio of 1.31:1.

              They mention that they are using stock pistons, but I know with a 3400 crank and psitons, there isn't much clearance between the crank conterweight and the pistons skirt at BDC. With an increased stroke, they almost have to use stock-length or longer rods, and much shorter pistons.

              I would rather see an aftermarket forged crank with the stock stroke that uses the larger SBC rod journal size (to increase strength, and allow use of more common aftermarket rods). The added displacement is always good, but the same power can be made with a stronger crank and mor revs.

              I would probably just spend my money on a 3900. It is almost 4L, and has the forged crank. Of course, this doesn't do the RWD people any good.

              When is someone going to make some 4-bolt main caps? I wonder if some aftermarket SBC caps could be machined to fit?

              Marty
              '99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
              '98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
              '84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
              '88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now

              Quote of the week:
              Originally posted by Aaron
              This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.

              Comment


              • #8
                however higher much revving could be bad on the hydraulic lifters
                3.4L camaro some goodies

                Comment

                Working...
                X