Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Using 3.4 iron head gaskets to raise compression?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Using 3.4 iron head gaskets to raise compression?

    I thought I read in a post somewhere that you can raise your compression a little bit by using a head gasket from an iron head 3.4 on an aluminum head 3.4. Am I remembering this right and if so will it work on a 3.1 with 3400 heads?

  • #2
    9.37 vs 8.92 is what I calculated using the site CR Calc.
    -Brad-
    89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
    sigpic
    Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks alot. So then I assume I can also use them on my 3.1. I'm really not sure what the difference in those numbers means in terms of power gains but I assume higher is better as long as there's no blower. Will the height difference cause any problems where the LIM meets the heads? Also, what cars had these iron head motors

      Comment


      • #4
        I know the iron head 3.4 gasket is .040 and you can get a performance version from felpro. I am not sure what fitment issue you may have as I haven't used them. There may be a 3.1 version. 93-95 camaro is the 3.4 iron head, and I don't know the specific years for the camaro vs 2.8 or 3.1.
        Ben
        60DegreeV6.com
        WOT-Tech.com

        Comment


        • #5
          2.8 until 1989, 3.1 90-92, 3.4 93-95
          Links:
          WOT-Tech.com
          FaceBook
          Instagram

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by SappySE107 View Post
            I am not sure what fitment issue you may have as I haven't used them. There may be a 3.1 version.
            Is there anybody out there that has tried this and can confirm whether it would work wih the 3400 Aluminum Heads on a 3.1?

            Comment


            • #7
              should work fine, all the coolant passages are the same... If heads will interchange so will the gaskets. Many people have done that w/o problems. Just don't do it to a 3400 or you may run into piston VS head problems...


              Why use 3.4 gaskets on a 3.1? just use the 3.1 Camaro gaskets, they're thinner as well and actually fit the bore better.


              ROL makes great quality gaskets, and they're good priced as well.. I'm running their .045" compressed 3.4 gasket on my 3500. Autozone can get them...
              Past Builds;
              1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
              1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
              Current Project;
              1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                Why use 3.4 gaskets on a 3.1? just use the 3.1 Camaro gaskets, they're thinner as well and actually fit the bore better.
                ROL makes great quality gaskets, and they're good priced as well.. I'm running their .045" compressed 3.4 gasket on my 3500. Autozone can get them...
                I actually thought just the 3.4's were thinner. I didn't realize all the iron head gaskets were the same size. I'll just get 3.1 head gaskets from a 90-92 camaro. Thanks for all your help

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by TazMan View Post
                  I actually thought just the 3.4's were thinner. I didn't realize all the iron head gaskets were the same size. I'll just get 3.1 head gaskets from a 90-92 camaro. Thanks for all your help
                  I'd call ROL to verify the compressed thickness of part number HG32640HT.. That's the graphite "high temperature" gasket they offer for the 3.1 Camaro. It's probably .045".

                  Fast, reliable answers and still in trust: Qwant does not store your search data, does not sell your personal data and is hosted in Europe.
                  Past Builds;
                  1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                  1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                  Current Project;
                  1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                    I'd call ROL to verify the compressed thickness of part number HG32640HT.. That's the graphite "high temperature" gasket they offer for the 3.1 Camaro. It's probably .045".

                    http://www.rolmfg.com/
                    Thanks, I'll do that. Maybe the one that isn't "high temp" will be .040.

                    I just read somewhere that the 3x00 pistons stick out .020" higher than the iron head 3.1. Does that include the Aluminum head Gen II 3.1, or do only the Gen3's stick out that high?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      only the gen3 3x00 pistons pop out, the gen2's and gen1's are fine.
                      Past Builds;
                      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                      Current Project;
                      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                        only the gen3 3x00 pistons pop out, the gen2's and gen1's are fine.
                        Is it because of the location of the wristpin?
                        Links:
                        WOT-Tech.com
                        FaceBook
                        Instagram

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                          Is it because of the location of the wristpin?
                          not sure why they did it.. maybe as a cheap way to raise compression.
                          Past Builds;
                          1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                          1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                          Current Project;
                          1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                            not sure why they did it.. maybe as a cheap way to raise compression.
                            I guess I was getting at weather or not the pistons are different in the gen 3, or was the deck height changed? I'm gathering parts for my new engine and don't want to make a mistake. (basically pistons are the last thing left).
                            Links:
                            WOT-Tech.com
                            FaceBook
                            Instagram

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ForcedFirebird View Post
                              I guess I was getting at weather or not the pistons are different in the gen 3, or was the deck height changed? I'm gathering parts for my new engine and don't want to make a mistake. (basically pistons are the last thing left).
                              pistons are different, deck height should be the same.
                              Past Builds;
                              1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                              1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                              Current Project;
                              1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X