I'm thinking that with a hone on a set of well used cylinders, the bore may be a bit big on a set of std replacement rings. That got me to thinking if the end gap on a set of STD rings is too large, could a set of .010 over rings be used and just filed on the ends?
Based on the assumption that overbores are stated in increase in diameter, I came up with these numbers
CYL size bore mm circum mm
std 92.029 197.1215166
0.005 92.156 197.3935442 * I realize this isn't a real option, but the numbers are important
0.01 92.283 197.6655719
0.02 92.791 198.7536825
0.03 93.553 200.3858484
0.04 94.569 202.5620696
If this chart is correct, the .010 over ring is only a total of .022in (.56mm) longer than a standard.
Assume after 150K miles of wear and a hone, the bores are .005 oversize already.
The spec for piston ring end gap is .25-.50mm.
The difference in circumference between .005OS and .010OS is .027mm
I know that I would have to check the ring gap at numerous points in the cylinder due to uneven wear, targeting the minimum of .025 end gap at the point of least wear (probably somewhere between 3/4s & 9/10s of the way down the cyl)
Three questions:
Is my assumption about overbore correct?
Is it feasible to use the .010 over rings and file off the ends of the rings in the event they are tighter than the .025 minimum end gap spec?
Does the end gap have a significant impact on the leak-down performance of the cylinder?
Thanks,
Paul
Based on the assumption that overbores are stated in increase in diameter, I came up with these numbers
CYL size bore mm circum mm
std 92.029 197.1215166
0.005 92.156 197.3935442 * I realize this isn't a real option, but the numbers are important
0.01 92.283 197.6655719
0.02 92.791 198.7536825
0.03 93.553 200.3858484
0.04 94.569 202.5620696
If this chart is correct, the .010 over ring is only a total of .022in (.56mm) longer than a standard.
Assume after 150K miles of wear and a hone, the bores are .005 oversize already.
The spec for piston ring end gap is .25-.50mm.
The difference in circumference between .005OS and .010OS is .027mm
I know that I would have to check the ring gap at numerous points in the cylinder due to uneven wear, targeting the minimum of .025 end gap at the point of least wear (probably somewhere between 3/4s & 9/10s of the way down the cyl)
Three questions:
Is my assumption about overbore correct?
Is it feasible to use the .010 over rings and file off the ends of the rings in the event they are tighter than the .025 minimum end gap spec?
Does the end gap have a significant impact on the leak-down performance of the cylinder?
Thanks,
Paul
Comment