Hello,
I have recently purchased ‘94 Grand Am that had been sitting still for at least three years (some 66k on it). It drives again now, but there is still one issue haunting me. Initially, there was a serious problem with the way it was driving (lack of power, hesitation on acceleration, rough idle, extremely high fuel consumption), but replacing the O2 sensor seemed to be a remedy. However after installing new sensor fuel consumption is still extremely high (around 7 mpg city driving, around 120 miles per tank!). Other than that car behaves almost normally (has the power and acceleration, idles pretty good). Also, car DOES NOT throw any CES light, or does this very occasionally.
Is it possible that since the car was sitting for so long and had accumulated a lot of moisture the wiring of CTS sensor has such a high resistance making ECU think it is very cold? Sensor itself screwed? Will this alone could explain such miserable fuel economy?
Any other ideas what might be a cause of this?
NOTE: in-dash gauge never seem to get above second mark (around 150 F), but it is hard to be believed since the speedo and fuel level gauge show unreliable data (speedo is by average 20 miles ahead of real speed).
I have recently purchased ‘94 Grand Am that had been sitting still for at least three years (some 66k on it). It drives again now, but there is still one issue haunting me. Initially, there was a serious problem with the way it was driving (lack of power, hesitation on acceleration, rough idle, extremely high fuel consumption), but replacing the O2 sensor seemed to be a remedy. However after installing new sensor fuel consumption is still extremely high (around 7 mpg city driving, around 120 miles per tank!). Other than that car behaves almost normally (has the power and acceleration, idles pretty good). Also, car DOES NOT throw any CES light, or does this very occasionally.
Is it possible that since the car was sitting for so long and had accumulated a lot of moisture the wiring of CTS sensor has such a high resistance making ECU think it is very cold? Sensor itself screwed? Will this alone could explain such miserable fuel economy?
Any other ideas what might be a cause of this?
NOTE: in-dash gauge never seem to get above second mark (around 150 F), but it is hard to be believed since the speedo and fuel level gauge show unreliable data (speedo is by average 20 miles ahead of real speed).
Comment