I just got a 3400 engine today and tore it down to the bare block. However, when i pulled the crank it said 3100 on it? Remind you this is out of a 2000GAGT. Are the cranks 3100 and 3400 the same?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3400 Crankshaft
Collapse
X
-
Yes, they are the same. They are also the same as the crank in the 3.1 MPFI engine from the late 80s/early 90s. All share the same stroke, so why change up the crank?-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
-
Same crank was used in the gen2 3.1, 3.4 DOHC, 3100, 3400 and the RWD Iron head 3.4
Comment
-
My comment was not about you changing the crank, but GM changing it.-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
Comment
-
GM never balanced the engine... so that should answer your question... At least that's what I've been told, so someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Only other thing I can think of is they were very close to the same weights and any variation was simply accounted for by drilling the crank to proper weight but I don't even know if that was done.
Got Lope?
3500 Build, Comp XFI Cam 218/230 .050 dur .570/.568 lift 113LSA
Fully Balanced, Ported, 3 Angle Valve Job, 65mm TCE TB, S&S Headers.
Stage-1 Raybestos/Alto 4t60e-HD, EP LSD, 3.69FDR
12.61@105 Epping NH Oct 2015 Nitrous 100shot (melted plugs) 13.58@98.8 N/A 3200LBS
Comment
-
No. But if you want to fill the holes you can weld it up. It is nodular iron so it wont crack. You can also have a good machine shop install mallory metal weights to increase the balance if needed.
GM most likely did a mass balance where all cranks were cast and balanced with the same weight and the pistons and rods were all within a certian weight spec.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
-
I pulled a crank out of a 3.1 and put it in a 3400 during a low budget rebuild back in '09. It ran great, nothing odd and he's put like 30K miles on it.
Comment
-
I just dont like the idea, how much does it cost to balance an engine? I want my engines as balanced as possible. They say v6s have an end to end imbalance, i wonder if lighter outer pistons could reduce this. If so it would have to be done just right. Maybe i should make a post specifically about balance.Firebird: The beta version
sigpic
Comment
-
You shouldn't need to worry much about balance with a stock bottom end. With solid motor mounts in my Firebird I hardly feel any vibration at all. No interior rattling or anything like that.'89 Firebird, 3500 Turbo, T56, 9-bolt/4.11
'86 Fiero, 3500, 4-speed
Comment
-
Even at idle yes it's perfectly smooth.
V8s are more naturally imbalanced than V6s. Heck 4 cylinders are way more imbalanced than V6s as well. That's why most modern 4 cylinders have balance shafts while most modern 60*V6s do not.
Balance shafts are more common in 90*V6s. I'm not really versed on the details but the V angle is best at about the same # of degrees a between power strokes. The most ideal angle for a V6 is 120* but that would make for a very wide engine so 60* is used as a compromise.'89 Firebird, 3500 Turbo, T56, 9-bolt/4.11
'86 Fiero, 3500, 4-speed
Comment
-
yeah i am not all about four cylinders... i love the idea of 60* v6s, but why did gm take the step of going to 60* for better balance without even balancing the rotating/reciprocating assembly? lol. you wouldnt happen to have the weight of your pistons and rods would you?
edit: also balance shafts can smooth some imbalance, but they also add other vibrations in different directionsFirebird: The beta version
sigpic
Comment
Comment