I've heard several members speak of cryo treating parts and just arrived at the question of nitriding while in the process of planning an offset grind of my crankshaft. Nitriding is a tried and true process so why the cryo treatment of important parts in the drivetrain during a power increase as opposed to nitriding which documentation to its effectiveness is not hard to find, versus cryo treatment which has far more sooth saying than documentation to back up its claims.
Here is a detailed highly informative read on crankshaft design and hardening with an excellent graph of the benefits of stock vs. heat treating vs. heat treating plus nitriding hardness effects. If nitriding is effective on cast and hyper pistons, it might be a great option for strength enhancement before going to custom parts.
I don't know much about the process but I'm sure someone here can offer some insight, such as the machinist on the forum.
Here is a detailed highly informative read on crankshaft design and hardening with an excellent graph of the benefits of stock vs. heat treating vs. heat treating plus nitriding hardness effects. If nitriding is effective on cast and hyper pistons, it might be a great option for strength enhancement before going to custom parts.
I don't know much about the process but I'm sure someone here can offer some insight, such as the machinist on the forum.
Comment