does anyone know of a companmy making lightened flywheels for an 91 3.1 i think it is an internall balence engine if i rember right.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
lightened flywheel
Collapse
X
-
camaros came with 2.8l from 80-89, 3.1l 90-92, and 3.4l 93-95. they also came with 3.8l i beleive 96+, and some years in the 80s they even came with the 2.5l iron duke.
they were talking about a 3.1 and 2.2 using the same flywheel. now i dont think they are the same flywheel, but they can be interchanged without problems.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sharkeycamaros came with 2.8l from 80-89, 3.1l 90-92, and 3.4l 93-95. they also came with 3.8l i beleive 96+, and some years in the 80s they even came with the 2.5l iron duke.
they were talking about a 3.1 and 2.2 using the same flywheel. now i dont think they are the same flywheel, but they can be interchanged without problems.
For RWD, they are different. The 2.2 S-10's also look like they use the FWD flywheel.97 Cavalier RS
3400, Isuzu MK7
Comment
-
i'm building a lotus super 7 replica with a spare 3.1 i have. the car will only weight 1200 pounds when complete so the trouqe from a heavy flywheel is not needed i want the thing to rev very fast, i'm going to check into weither a 2.2 flywheel will fit my rwd 3.1 i don't see why not i think the front wheel drive v6 use the same flex plate so why not the same flywheel, i check it out and keep u guys posted
Comment
-
i found that frindza (sp?) makes a lightened flywheel for the 3.1 rwd and the gen 1-2 fwd cars it's even on there web site as 2.2/3.1 and they show a flywheel for older 2.8s also they all weight 8 pounds and run about 350 bucks. that should make one of these engine very fast reving
Comment
-
Originally posted by rx191i found that frindza (sp?) makes a lightened flywheel for the 3.1 rwd and the gen 1-2 fwd cars it's even on there web site as 2.2/3.1 and they show a flywheel for older 2.8s also they all weight 8 pounds and run about 350 bucks. that should make one of these engine very fast reving
Here's a pic of my Fidanza flywheel showing no counter weight.
here's an externally balanced flywheel.
I could be wrong, so double check, but I'm pretty sure thats the situation you're in. If I were you, and being that you want a quick reving engine, get a 3400 FWD engine, it'll be more what you're looking for.
Comment
-
Originally posted by betterthanyouDude None of our engines have been external balance since 88.
Also I've posted this same info here countless times, and yet no one seems to remember it.
The FWD and RWD Flexplates/flyhwheels are different diameters. The RWD is IIRC 1/2" larger in diameter than the FWD counterpart. It's between 1/2" and 5/8" anyway.
I do not know about the RWD 2.2 flywheel/flexplate however. I do see how it would most likely be the FWD variant, due to the FWD starter placement.
I do not know of any off the shelf lightened flywheels for the RWD.
You may be able to adapt use a FWD version, but starter engagment will need to be verified before you try and run it with the combination of parts. Might be a gear change or something like that to solve all issues.
Comment
-
FWD flywheels measure 12", 142 teeth. The RWD flywheel I have from an '85 2.8L S-10 measures 12-1/2", 148 teeth.
Marty'99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
'98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
'84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
'88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now
Quote of the week:Originally posted by AaronThis is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.
Comment
Comment