Short version: I need the bores, exterior dimensions, pictures, etc of master cylinders.
My clutch experiment didn't work. I hoped that a stock Miata master cylinder would motivate a Camaro slave. While I get slave motion when pushing the clutch, its not enough to free up the clutch plate or break the plastic retaining strap around the piston. I've done a little research:
Bore area, assuming a circular piston, is
(D/2)(D/2)(22/7) I don't know a better way to write Area=Pi 'R' squared.
Miata/X is the amount of travel the slave will travel if pumped with the same amount of fluid needed to push a Miata slave 1".
Slave cylinder`````bore``bore area``Miata/X
F-body 3.4/5.7```````1"````.786"````.562"
Fiero 2.8````````15/16"````.691"````.691"
Miata 1.6``````````3/4"````.442"```````1"
(Sorry about the ```. The forum deletes my extra spaces)
So it looks like my Miata master is only 1/2 as efficient vs. the F-body slave.
The only info I can get about master cylinders is that the Fiero uses a 7/10" bore and has a .385" bore area. I'm considering the fiero master since it looks to be a similar size to the Miata. The F-body master is too large to fit without serious firewall/wheel well modification.
Assuming that a Fiero master stroked 1" displaces .385"cu.in. of fluid, that fluid would move the Fiero slave .557". The same master would move the F-body slave .490". Thats only .067" difference, or just over 1/16".
Do you think its safe to try this clutch master with a 1/16" or 6.7% deficiency?
I also see that a '90 cavalier has a 1 1/4" bore slave and a reasonable-looking master cylinder. While I can't find the bore on this one, it could have potential if someone can get me info/pics.
My clutch experiment didn't work. I hoped that a stock Miata master cylinder would motivate a Camaro slave. While I get slave motion when pushing the clutch, its not enough to free up the clutch plate or break the plastic retaining strap around the piston. I've done a little research:
Bore area, assuming a circular piston, is
(D/2)(D/2)(22/7) I don't know a better way to write Area=Pi 'R' squared.
Miata/X is the amount of travel the slave will travel if pumped with the same amount of fluid needed to push a Miata slave 1".
Slave cylinder`````bore``bore area``Miata/X
F-body 3.4/5.7```````1"````.786"````.562"
Fiero 2.8````````15/16"````.691"````.691"
Miata 1.6``````````3/4"````.442"```````1"
(Sorry about the ```. The forum deletes my extra spaces)
So it looks like my Miata master is only 1/2 as efficient vs. the F-body slave.
The only info I can get about master cylinders is that the Fiero uses a 7/10" bore and has a .385" bore area. I'm considering the fiero master since it looks to be a similar size to the Miata. The F-body master is too large to fit without serious firewall/wheel well modification.
Assuming that a Fiero master stroked 1" displaces .385"cu.in. of fluid, that fluid would move the Fiero slave .557". The same master would move the F-body slave .490". Thats only .067" difference, or just over 1/16".
Do you think its safe to try this clutch master with a 1/16" or 6.7% deficiency?
I also see that a '90 cavalier has a 1 1/4" bore slave and a reasonable-looking master cylinder. While I can't find the bore on this one, it could have potential if someone can get me info/pics.
Comment