I'm building a little T-modified hot rod around an 89 Camaro 2.8 v6 and 700R4. I'm trying to position the engine so it sits level. I know that typically engines, and the attached transmissions, have been mounted with around a 5 degree tilt to the rear. Will mounting a 700R4 level cause problems? If so, what is the minimum mounting angle I can get by with?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
700R4 positioning
Collapse
X
-
about 3 degrees in relation to the ground, it matters more for driveline angle. You'll have to check all that once you know how the rear suspension is going to act under load.
The engine/trans will be fine level if needed, it's the U joint angles that i'd worry about.
-
Originally posted by Superdave View Postabout 3 degrees in relation to the ground, it matters more for driveline angle. You'll have to check all that once you know how the rear suspension is going to act under load.
The engine/trans will be fine level if needed, it's the U joint angles that i'd worry about.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zandoz View PostI'm building a little T-modified hot rod around an 89 Camaro 2.8 v6 and 700R4. I'm trying to position the engine so it sits level. I know that typically engines, and the attached transmissions, have been mounted with around a 5 degree tilt to the rear. Will mounting a 700R4 level cause problems? If so, what is the minimum mounting angle I can get by with?
the only issue I can see, would be oil drainage, alot of engines/transmissions are installed with a slope so oil flows towards the pickup."I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."
Comment
-
oiling should be ok with the 2.8 having a rear pickup in the pan, a little slope would help but isn't the pan already sloped a little?
Here is a good article on driveline angles. I just had this battle with my Nova fighting some weird harmonics at 40 MPH and higher. http://www.hotrodhotline.com/md/html..._harmonics.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by Superdave View Postoiling should be ok with the 2.8 having a rear pickup in the pan, a little slope would help but isn't the pan already sloped a little?
Here is a good article on driveline angles. I just had this battle with my Nova fighting some weird harmonics at 40 MPH and higher. http://www.hotrodhotline.com/md/html..._harmonics.php"I am not what you so glibly call to be a civilized man. I have broken with society for reasons which I alone am able to appreciate. I am therefore not subject to it's stupid laws, and I ask you to never allude to them in my presence again."
Comment
-
The car I'm building is going to be very low. With the engine/transmission level, the low points of the pans would be about 6" off the ground. Tilted 3 degrees, with the transmission mount as the focal point, results in the transmission yoke below the differential toke...and bad universal/driveshaft angles. To fix that the whole engine/transmission package needs to be raised over 3"...putting the top of the distributor higher than the cowl, and cutting into already tight pedal room in the interior.
My uneducated worry with setting the package level, is the angle of the transmission pan. With a three degree package angle, the transmission pan is still tilted low end to the front...with the package level, the angle looks like it would be about double...around 5-6 degrees.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zandoz View PostMy uneducated worry with setting the package level, is the angle of the transmission pan. With a three degree package angle, the transmission pan is still tilted low end to the front...with the package level, the angle looks like it would be about double...around 5-6 degrees.Lifting my front wheels, one jack at a time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1988GTU View PostCut the bottom out of the pan (disposition for later use) , add in triangular walls to change fluid pitch, & increase the back wall taper to support the grade difference.
Comment
Comment