Ok..Are mid 90`s 3.1 main and rod bearings thinner than 85 or 86 2.8 bearings..I put a 3.1 crank in my 2.8 block and when you torque the rod and mains, the motor is locked..I used bearings for an 86 2.8..If not fully torqued, the crank turns smooth and nothing is hitting the block..It is a crank sensor type crankshaft but the crank fully clears the block..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bearing thickness?
Collapse
X
-
should be the same. Sounds like .010 bearings on std journal or just incorrect clearance on a machined crank with matching bearings. The 80 to 84 are small, and sometime in 85 or 86 they changed to larger mains but I am not familiar with their actual size back then. Could also be the caps are not in the right spots. tighten one down and see if it spins.Ben
60DegreeV6.com
WOT-Tech.com
-
I did some checking and the part numbers for 86 bearings is different than 97 3.1 bearings...Out of curiosity, I looked up bearings for an 87 2.8..Same part number as the 97 3.1..It would seem that the 86 is different..The bearings I put in are std size and the crank has not been worked on..What I really need to know is, if the journals are different..Did they just increase the diameter of the journals on the crank or did they increase the main size on the block as well..I think they just increased the journal size on the crank and not the block = thinner bearings..
Comment
Comment