Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More timing cover info 3.1-2.8

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More timing cover info 3.1-2.8

    This 3.1 Aluminum head conversion to the 2.8 iron head front timing cover and water pump is being amazingly painful. Even though the holes for the timing cover line up between the S-10 type cover and the modern type cover with the high water pump, it is not a direct swap out. Seems the holes on the left side (three of them) are M-12's on the new engine while they were M-8 and M-10's on the older engines. Not a show stopper, but the covers will not directly swap. My solution was to drill the mount holes out to 1/2 inch, this left enough sealing thickness and aluminum around the hole for a good mount, however I think if I did it again I would make up some studs with a M-12 thred into the block and a reduced shank of like 3/8 to hold down the pump and cover. The cover/pump assembly ends up with M-6, M-8, M-10 and M-12 bolts in it. Because of the thread pitch differences, the torque applied to the bolts are 35 ft pounds, 25 foot pounds, 16 foot pounds and 7 1/2 foot pounds, lots of socket swaping. Guess no one said this would be easy. All this to get a low alternator mount and be rid of ideler pulleys to fit in a Fiero. Larry

  • #2
    same as i did.. just drilled the 3 holes out to 1/2" and they've been fine since... 2.8 RWD cover on a 3500.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment


    • #3
      Then confidence is high! I have Feldpro gaskets, punched the holes out to clear the bolts, what type of gasket cement did you use? Larry

      Comment


      • #4
        We have had good luck using M12 to M8 threaded inserts from McMaster. This leaves plenty of stock and gasket around the holes. And you won't have to drill the holes out on a replacement water pump should you need to change it.

        In the front cover, did you plug the unused hole just below the left coolant port?
        MinusOne - 3100 - 4T60E
        '79 MGB - LZ9 - T5
        http://www.tcemotorsports.com
        http://www.britishcarconversions.com/lx9-conversion

        Comment


        • #5
          I do have an unused (M6) hole but it does not go through. If it did it would enter the timing chain cover. Is that the one you are talking about? I do have some spare bolts I could put in it. Larry

          Comment


          • #6
            Larry... it's a coolant hole that is used on RWD block but missing on the FWD blocks. If you don't plug it, your coolant will pour out. See picture below.
            Attached Files
            MinusOne - 3100 - 4T60E
            '79 MGB - LZ9 - T5
            http://www.tcemotorsports.com
            http://www.britishcarconversions.com/lx9-conversion

            Comment


            • #7
              You saved me great pain and suffering! Should I just put an expansion (freeze) plug in it? Larry

              Comment


              • #8
                And why do you cut the top ear off? Larry

                Comment


                • #9
                  An expansion plug would probably work fine. I usually weld a plug in the hole.

                  Cutting the top ear off will let you rotate the lower intake 180 degrees so the T-stat is in the front for RWD applications.
                  MinusOne - 3100 - 4T60E
                  '79 MGB - LZ9 - T5
                  http://www.tcemotorsports.com
                  http://www.britishcarconversions.com/lx9-conversion

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I may do that, it is going into a Fiero, so it would work either way, but the stock engine has the water in and out on the same end, so this is probalby better to swap it. Larry

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X