Nah I would just leave the heads on. Unless you think you should inspect the pistons and cylinders. The pressurization tool for the cylinders is cheep and convenient makes quick work of spring changes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
3.4 swap into 1985 Jeep Cherokee questions?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by betterthanyou View PostNah I would just leave the heads on. Unless you think you should inspect the pistons and cylinders. The pressurization tool for the cylinders is cheep and convenient makes quick work of spring changes.
I have a video of the engine running and not smoking or anything so I do not have any reason to believe that something in the bottom end of the engine is bad.
I did not get a chance to work on anything today but here is a pic of how I left it yesterday. I got dampner off then the timing chain cover, and I took the exhaust off, then the most time consuming part was scraping all of the old gasket material off of the timing chain cover area and the valve cover gaskets. Does everything still look fine?
Comment
-
Originally posted by betterthanyou View PostYes the tool is the one that screws into the plug hole. The other end attaches to a compressor.
Comment
-
Any parts store will have it. You can just run a few PSI. 25 PSI will do it. Just remember to leave your compressor on because they cylinders do leak down so the compressor will need to be able to recharge.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
-
Assuming I am going to run this set up with the stock SFI system from the Camaro, i will need to bypass the VATS system. Does anyone know if this product will work? For the price it looks like it could save me a lot of time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by betterthanyou View PostAny parts store will have it. You can just run a few PSI. 25 PSI will do it. Just remember to leave your compressor on because they cylinders do leak down so the compressor will need to be able to recharge.
Comment
-
Yea your going to have to find a chip from a manual trans car. If you want to use the SFI system I STRONGLY recommend an in tank pump. Use any Jeep pump that was used on the 4 or 6 cyl SFI engines. They will supply the fuel you need. Like I said if you can get the tank with sending unit from the junkyard then do that. Then all you need is the return line and off you go.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
-
With my Trooper SFI swap, I just nabbed a fuel pump and pickup assembly from 4 cyl Trooper (the 4 cyl used multiport). Dropped right in and worked great, one of the few things in my project that did. Might see if you can do something similar, grab a newer Jeep's fuel pump assembly.'98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
'96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
'92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
'71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits
Comment
-
I will try to pick up a 5 speed ecm. The harness I have will work with this correct?
Why do you suggest the intank pump so strongly over the inline? I am just curious because swaping fuel tanks was not something I was planning on.
Oh, and I picked up a VATS system bypass on ebay. With shipping and insurance it was not even 30 bucks so that sounded a lot better than wiring a bunch or resistors.
Comment
-
It is much more efficient to push fuel than to pull it. Less chance of collapsing your fuel lines with the tank in the pump, considering the great increase in pressure you'll be dealing with.'98 Volvo V90 - Ford 5.0 swap in progress
'96 LR Range Rover 4.6 HSE - suspiciously reliable
'92 Volvo 740 Wagon - former parts car, now daily-driver beater
'71 Opel Kadett Wagon - 1.9L CIH w/ Weber DGV 32/36, in bits
Comment
-
Originally posted by Canyonero View PostIt is much more efficient to push fuel than to pull it. Less chance of collapsing your fuel lines with the tank in the pump, considering the great increase in pressure you'll be dealing with.
Comment
-
In line pumps suffer from vapor lock and are less efficient, more noisy and run hot and never last as long as an in tank pump.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
-
Originally posted by betterthanyou View PostIn line pumps suffer from vapor lock and are less efficient, more noisy and run hot and never last as long as an in tank pump.
Do you have any input on my post 43?
Comment
Comment