Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tuning question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tuning question

    Driving an '89 Cavy 5 speed with a '94 3.1L swapped in. Running modified BFUZ code.

    Upon startup in open loop, my BLM is always 120. When it switches to closed loop it goes normal, but in open loop it's always 120. Why?
    The only thing I can find that I think might regard this is the "SAM Cell A (Idle)" 0x6ED and 0x6EE which are 120 and 135 respectively.

    To me, this seems like it has something to do with the BLM (it's under the BLM settings at least) but I still don't get why it always starts at 120.

  • #2
    BLM's don't matter till it's in closed loop anyways.. i'd just ignore it.
    Past Builds;
    1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
    1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
    Current Project;
    1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, but the BLM stays at 120 into closed loop, it doesn't reset to 128.
      Then my INT goes lean of course, to around 136-140, because the fuel is being cut.

      Just doesn't make sense to me.

      Comment


      • #4
        post up your bin.. i agree, if it's going into closed loop at 120 then there is a problem..

        have you reset the ECM ?
        Past Builds;
        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
        Current Project;
        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

        Comment


        • #5
          properly tuned, BLM/INT will read 128/128 in closed loop. when i connected my ALDL cable, i found my BLM was reading 136 and INT 128 in open loop. now, with a better tune and an open loop fueling revision, they are both now consistently at 128. i also recommend setting the sample rate to 4 per second. otherwise you'll stress on all the detail and try to fine tune before the rough tune. since i've done that, things are going rather well and quickly! bout time!
          Andy

          sigpic

          fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
          fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

          62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by torq455 View Post
            properly tuned, BLM/INT will read 128/128 in closed loop. when i connected my ALDL cable, i found my BLM was reading 136 and INT 128 in open loop. now, with a better tune and an open loop fueling revision, they are both now consistently at 128. i also recommend setting the sample rate to 4 per second. otherwise you'll stress on all the detail and try to fine tune before the rough tune. since i've done that, things are going rather well and quickly! bout time!
            even a completely stock factory fresh 3.1 won't read 128 all the time.. It'll always be different depending on how high you are above sea level, the humidity, air temp etc..


            that's what the block learn and integrator are for.. correcting for atmospheric conditions.
            Past Builds;
            1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
            1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
            Current Project;
            1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

            Comment


            • #7
              which is why i said properly tuned.
              Andy

              sigpic

              fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
              fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

              62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

              Comment


              • #8
                Here's a copy of my bin.
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #9
                  New question.
                  I just picked up a heated O2 sensor. What temp are you guys allowing closed loop operation with a heated O2? Stock is 40 degrees C, but I'd like to lower that (maybe to 0* C??) for faster closed loop in the winter. I'm up in Edmonton, Alberta where it's pretty much a solid -30* C for a month and I'd like to see some better mpgs this winter. I'm also going to lower my closed loop entry timers after I do some cold testing to see how long it takes the O2 to start swinging properly when it's cold.
                  Last winter I saw a 5 city mpg drop (19 to 14) in the winter.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    why not just lower the timers?
                    Andy

                    sigpic

                    fastest 1/8: 10.19@ 67.17
                    fastest 1/4: 16.16@ 82.70

                    62mm TB, 1.6 roller tip rockers, Ostrich 2.0, UD pulley, TB heater bypass, K&N, 180* stat, No cat, 99Grand AM dual cooling fans. 4T65E swap FDR 3.69, EP LSD, F.A.S.T. transmission controller, TransGo shift kit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      My trip to work is only about 5 miles. In -30*C that is not even enough distance to heat the car to operating temperature, even with a couple minutes of idle time.
                      I do not like to have my car idling for 10 minutes just to heat it up, but I also hate seeing 8 or 9 AFRs for most of my trip to work.

                      I've already decreased the wait timers a little bit (like 30 seconds or so), but I'd like to get into closed loop as fast as possible.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        for a 4 wire sensor i set them to 30 sec on cold and warm.. then 10 sec on hot.

                        i suppose you could lean out the "Open loop AFR vs Coolant Temp vs MAP" table and also the "Closed Throttle open loop AFR vs Coolant Temp" tables to try and save a bit of fuel when it's cold out... Stock tuning has those commanding 10.x and 11.x AFR's.
                        Past Builds;
                        1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                        1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                        Current Project;
                        1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Superdave View Post
                          for a 4 wire sensor i set them to 30 sec on cold and warm.. then 10 sec on hot.

                          i suppose you could lean out the "Open loop AFR vs Coolant Temp vs MAP" table and also the "Closed Throttle open loop AFR vs Coolant Temp" tables to try and save a bit of fuel when it's cold out... Stock tuning has those commanding 10.x and 11.x AFR's.
                          For serious?

                          That's very rich!

                          My car goes that rich now, at start (even warm start), and want to reduce it, because it's just too much.

                          Mine is due to larger than stock injectors and haven't tuned any cold start parameters. I just can't imagine comanding such a fat AFR.
                          Last edited by Guest; 09-26-2008, 08:11 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The_Raven View Post
                            For serious?

                            That's very rich!

                            My car goes that rich now, at start (even warm start), and want to reduce it, because it's just too much.
                            Yup, stock startup AFRs along with the AFR timeouts that lower it further cause massively rich AFRs in cold and even warm startups.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by discostu View Post
                              Yup, stock startup AFRs along with the AFR timeouts that lower it further cause massively rich AFRs in cold and even warm startups.
                              exactly the reason i disabled open loop mode.. mine would run in the 6.x AFR range and die constantly untill closed loop would come in and it would run great.
                              Past Builds;
                              1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                              1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                              Current Project;
                              1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X