The latest tuning session on my 88turbo Grand Am (Daewoo 4-valve head swap) The Daewoo head is very similar to the 3.4DOHC head.
Here are the results. I think the same results will show for the TURBO 3.4DOHC when compared to stock cam settings. (We have seen similar results on originally n/a Honda/Acura engines, both V-tec and non-V-tec).
All runs in second gear, 7-8psi boost.
Stock (actually +4deg. int/exh due to thicker head gasket): Peaked 160whp at 5600. Very narrow powerband, 4500-6000.
Intake -11deg, Exhaust +4deg: Peaked 180whp at 5600. Gained 20whp from 4500-6500, 40whp at 7000, and 57whp at 7500. Boosted quicker, more complete filling of cylinders due to reduced overlap.
Intake -11deg, Exhaust -11deg: Peaked 190whp at 6000. Lost 20whp at 4500, gained 15hp at 7000-7500. Same power curve as stock, just 500rpm higher.
So we gained 75whp with just cam timing!!!!!!
I was limited by non-adjustable cam gears to one-full-tooth movement. One tooth is 7.5 cam/15 crank degrees. There are no such limits with the 3.4!
Summary: For a street-driven, boosted 3.4DOHC, I recommend +4deg. exhaust, -10deg. intake. For a auto trans/street/strip. For full race turbo where traction is an issue, I recommend -4deg. exhaust, -14 intake.
The reduction of 10 or more degrees in overlap is critical for good use of boost. My '96 is set up 0exh, -10int. For the sake of science, I will probably put it back stock before I put it in the car. Then I can make these changes on the dyno for proof. Still, I stick by my recommendations for all you guys running turbos. Again... free dyno time in Atlanta for anyone wanting to test anything on the 3.4DOHC.
BTW, the end result on the TGA: ran out of fuel with the stock injectors at 240whp at 17psi.
Here are the results. I think the same results will show for the TURBO 3.4DOHC when compared to stock cam settings. (We have seen similar results on originally n/a Honda/Acura engines, both V-tec and non-V-tec).
All runs in second gear, 7-8psi boost.
Stock (actually +4deg. int/exh due to thicker head gasket): Peaked 160whp at 5600. Very narrow powerband, 4500-6000.
Intake -11deg, Exhaust +4deg: Peaked 180whp at 5600. Gained 20whp from 4500-6500, 40whp at 7000, and 57whp at 7500. Boosted quicker, more complete filling of cylinders due to reduced overlap.
Intake -11deg, Exhaust -11deg: Peaked 190whp at 6000. Lost 20whp at 4500, gained 15hp at 7000-7500. Same power curve as stock, just 500rpm higher.
So we gained 75whp with just cam timing!!!!!!
I was limited by non-adjustable cam gears to one-full-tooth movement. One tooth is 7.5 cam/15 crank degrees. There are no such limits with the 3.4!
Summary: For a street-driven, boosted 3.4DOHC, I recommend +4deg. exhaust, -10deg. intake. For a auto trans/street/strip. For full race turbo where traction is an issue, I recommend -4deg. exhaust, -14 intake.
The reduction of 10 or more degrees in overlap is critical for good use of boost. My '96 is set up 0exh, -10int. For the sake of science, I will probably put it back stock before I put it in the car. Then I can make these changes on the dyno for proof. Still, I stick by my recommendations for all you guys running turbos. Again... free dyno time in Atlanta for anyone wanting to test anything on the 3.4DOHC.
BTW, the end result on the TGA: ran out of fuel with the stock injectors at 240whp at 17psi.
Comment