Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this intercooler any good?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I have the one he posted last and i have no problem with..flow is great no pressure loss no lag so the cheap intercooler are actually good..the lowest themp ive seen it reading is 73 on a 60*ish night while cruising at about 75-80 and i DONT have alot of airflow hitting it
    1994 Chevy Corsica. Parted out. Just a rotting shell now
    Best 1/4mile ET - 12.9
    Best 1/4mile MPH - 111
    1997 Ford Ranger Splash
    Daily Driver

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Mars View Post
      Same side eh ?



      I'd go for a real Spearco core... The "cheap" intercoolers just seem too good to be true... Maybe they are OK, but I dunno...
      I helped loner install the I/C pictured and he's right - very little flow...




      Still hit 6psi consistantly with a 6psi spring in the gate. Same side made it easier for his install, but I would think opposite side would flow a little better.
      Links:
      WOT-Tech.com
      FaceBook
      Instagram

      Comment


      • #18
        same side will mean less distance and throttle lag

        if you go for a cheaper IC i would simply suggest you wash it first... sometimes the cheaper parts come with a lil extra dirt....

        Comment


        • #19
          well i want to go same side because it should be alot easier to plumb that way, and honestly i really dont care about some lag because instead of sending me a .81 a/r turbine housing they sent me a .68 a/r one, and i have a 5 speed and im already worried about launching this thing, can we say uncontrollable wheel spin, lol
          also you say on a 60* night you were blowing 73*, is that good? or bad?

          thanks

          Jake
          GM Goodwrench Tech - GM Certified

          1991 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - 3.4L DOHC , 5 Speed Manual Transmission , Turbonetics 62mm turbo, Turbonectics Evolution Wastegate , Turbonetics Raptor BOV , Large Front Mount Intercooler , AEM Methanol Injection , Car is running at 11PSI currently with methanol injection.

          Runs 13.4 In the 1/4 with a 3 second 60 foot

          Comment


          • #20
            i think you missunderstood.... the opposite sides would have more lag due to longer plumbing, the shorter the "charge pipe" (which includes the IC) the less the throttle lag

            60 degree night at only 13 decrease increase in intake temps is great considering your compressing the air (which creates heat) and plumbing it all around your hot engine bay, i would love to manage that.... the only way your gonna get lower than ambiant(sp?) air temps is with a compressed gas being spray on the IC (nitrous and co2 being the most popular)

            Comment


            • #21
              Oh ok thanks for clearing that up, i just dont know much about intercoolers or boosting in general, lol they dont teach us this kind of stuff to fix cars.

              thanks

              Jake
              GM Goodwrench Tech - GM Certified

              1991 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - 3.4L DOHC , 5 Speed Manual Transmission , Turbonetics 62mm turbo, Turbonectics Evolution Wastegate , Turbonetics Raptor BOV , Large Front Mount Intercooler , AEM Methanol Injection , Car is running at 11PSI currently with methanol injection.

              Runs 13.4 In the 1/4 with a 3 second 60 foot

              Comment


              • #22
                I'm a big fan of same side inlet/exit top to bottom flow intercoolers. However, w-bodies don't have a lot of room for them so trimming may be required. For mine, I had to fabricate a new hood support.

                Cooling can definitely be an issue with turbos. Keeping your cooling system clean, your fluid fresh, the fans working, and all of the ducting to direct air at the radiator is critical.

                Tim
                1995 Z34 - T04E "60" trim, 42.5 lb/hr injectors, AEM WBO2, FFP UD&DB, 3" exhaust, 2800 stall, shift kit, tranny cooler, Powerslot, Hawk HPS, rear disc conversion, KYB, Eibach, HMS F&R STB, Fittipaldi Force 18" wheels, big stereo, lots more coming eventually...
                325 whp 350 lb-ft

                Comment


                • #23
                  Tim, I read in a book that if does not matter about directing the air to the radiator, as the air will go through the intercooler and straight through to the radiator.


                  WWW.OverKillEngineeringMotorsports.com

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Tim, I read in a book that if does not matter about directing the air to the radiator, as the air will go through the intercooler and straight through to the radiator.
                    lol then throw that book away
                    The air passed thru the IC is carrying heat away from the IC. It will take less heat away from the radiator, which is no good if you are pushing enough boost.

                    To the OP air flow and management is very critical; you have to compromise. Also if you are not going to run more than 7psi you don't necessarily need an intercooler!!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Actually water to air is not all that bad if you run coolant from the cold side of your radiator. In fact if you run a coolant fan full time it would be even better. But if you lived down south were theres warmer weather I don't think it would be much help.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by demonfiero3.4 View Post
                        Actually water to air is not all that bad if you run coolant from the cold side of your radiator. In fact if you run a coolant fan full time it would be even better. But if you lived down south were theres warmer weather I don't think it would be much help.
                        generaly a air-to-water has its own coolant resivor so it isn't effected by the engines radiator. the air to water system is a completely seporate seald system with its own pump, res., and radiator. Air to water is actually better at cooling then air to air. Water has a better heat exchange then air to air.

                        S
                        Shane "RedZMonte"
                        2004 Corvette Z06 Commemorative Edition -VIRGIN
                        1995 Monte Carlo Z34 14.38@101mph, 331hp/355tq
                        -Turbonetics T04E Super 60 Turbo, 2.5" Borla Catback, OBDII, 42.5# Injectors
                        2004 Subaru WRX STI -Lightly Modded (SOLD)
                        1994 Lumina Z34 -VIRGIN (SOLD)
                        1992 Lumina Z34-VIRGIN (RIP)
                        1992 L67 Lumina Z34 (SOLD)
                        1990 Turbo Grand Prix (SOLD)

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          The ducting I'm talking about is all of the stock radiator ducting. Removing it drastically hurts radiator efficiency.

                          Tim
                          1995 Z34 - T04E "60" trim, 42.5 lb/hr injectors, AEM WBO2, FFP UD&DB, 3" exhaust, 2800 stall, shift kit, tranny cooler, Powerslot, Hawk HPS, rear disc conversion, KYB, Eibach, HMS F&R STB, Fittipaldi Force 18" wheels, big stereo, lots more coming eventually...
                          325 whp 350 lb-ft

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X