Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SC + twinturbo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    OK, Timg, thanks for the post. It had been awhile since I read it and I'm glad there was someone else to catch my error.
    Tuning a car is full of compromises. You must decide if you are willing to give up either reliability, performance, or a whole load of cash. Also remember that repairs will seem to come up much more often as you strive for even more performance

    Comment


    • #17
      I got an idea that can be a good...

      ...compromise between the two. A Viscous-coupled belt- drive Turbo. BAsically a belt drive spinning a viscous coupler(torque converter of sorts). Multiplying the gear ratio and attaining turbo rpms. Viola!

      Comment


      • #18
        A viscous coupler will not multiply rpm.
        '99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
        '98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
        '84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
        '88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now

        Quote of the week:
        Originally posted by Aaron
        This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.

        Comment


        • #19
          Repeat this statement, in fact write it on your garage wall:

          "More is not always better."

          Yes compund charging can be done, but is absolutly not nessissary and only gives bragging rights in the end. Once I get my Jimmy back together I'd put it up against any other daily driven vehicle of similar concept, especially if it's compound induction, I bet I'd win in a race, BTW, Single power adder, at least most of the time, I will have a nitrous kit connected but only for track days and only when the 350+ HP produced with the help of the turbo(s), just isn't enough for me.

          Even in RWD, at times the turbo lag can be a god send, I know with my Jimmy, before I added the track bars I'd blow the wheels off with little to no boost off the line, and now that I can get traction, I will add more power, but it's still going to be a challenge to get that torque down.

          I will always believe that one type of forced induction is all that is needed.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by timg View Post
            Sport Compact Car did that with the MR2. I probably have the article at home.
            thats funny cause i read an editorial in the same magazine, where they talked about the group b rally cars and how pointless it is for the average person to do this.
            26+6=1

            Comment


            • #21
              Hear is some good reading about why you would do a dual boost style application. Though I doubt you have the tuning capabilties to make it as effiective because of the lack of direct injection to top that off they have done some flapper details in the exaust and intake changing that around. A short reason is emissions. But i say if your board have lots of money and engine tuning shop and lots of dino time.....
              GET ER DONE!!!!

              Last edited by ignoreance; 01-07-2007, 06:26 AM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Insperation or braging or what u call it:


                But now its off topic again...

                If I put my question like this then:

                What turbos would u use if u wanted to twinturbo charge a 3.1 L 60 degree V6?? (no SC just twinturbo) If u can it would be great if u could say at what rpm the turbos start charging...

                Regards
                Tha Swede
                ...Pain Is Just Weakness Leaving The Body...

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by tha_SwEdE View Post
                  Insperation or braging or what u call it:


                  But now its off topic again...

                  If I put my question like this then:

                  What turbos would u use if u wanted to twinturbo charge a 3.1 L 60 degree V6?? (no SC just twinturbo) If u can it would be great if u could say at what rpm the turbos start charging...

                  Regards
                  Tha Swede

                  It'll depend on the actual use of the vehicle, how much the vehicle weighs, what transmission is being used, what gear ratios are within, along with the final drive, etc.

                  Just to put it simply, a heavier vehicle, or one with "longer" gears, can spool a larger turbo quicker than the same turbo installed in a lighter vehicle and/or one with shorter gears. The actual load placed on the engine has a LOT to do with this.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    huh?? what are u talking about??
                    the gera ratio and weight of the car will only diterm how fast the car will go and accelerate... not when the turbo starts chargin.. thats the engine that do that part...
                    ...Pain Is Just Weakness Leaving The Body...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Twin charged cars = Dyno Queens
                      Past Builds;
                      1991 Z24, 3500/5 Spd. 275WHP/259WTQ 13.07@108 MPH
                      1989 Camaro RS, ITB-3500/700R4. 263WHP/263WTQ 13.52@99.2 MPH
                      Current Project;
                      1972 Nova 12.73@105.7 MPH

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by tha_SwEdE View Post
                        huh?? what are u talking about??
                        the gera ratio and weight of the car will only diterm how fast the car will go and accelerate... not when the turbo starts chargin.. thats the engine that do that part...
                        No, actually the weight of the car AND the gears DO indeed have an effect on the spool characterists of the turbo(s).

                        I have tested and VERIFIED this mysefl with my Jimmy (and other vehicles), towing I spool alomost a 1000 RPM lower, in first gear, and about 800 RPM lower in 2nd, I forget about the rest. This is towing a car on a car trailer I mean, so yes weight has an effect.

                        Start reading up on turbocharging, anyone who knows anything about turbos and builds turbo vehicles KNOWs this is a consideration when selecting a turbocharger.
                        Last edited by Guest; 01-11-2007, 02:38 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Yep...Raven is right. In the lower gears, the engine accelerates too fast, so it takes longer to build boost. Some turbo cars can't even hit peak boost in 1st gear.
                          '99 Z-28 - Weekend Driver
                          '98 Dodge Neon - Winter Beater
                          '84 X-11 - Time and Money Pit
                          '88 Fiero Formula - Bone stock for now

                          Quote of the week:
                          Originally posted by Aaron
                          This is why I don't build crappy headers. I'm not sure, I don't know too much about welding.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X