Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The GTO Stands Alone.

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The GTO Stands Alone.

    '08 GTO Spared, But That's All
    What the GM Future looks like

    By Todd Lassa
    Motor Trend

    General Motors's plans for a rear-drive Buick Velite sedan, convertible, or anything else are officially dead. The murder also affects any rear-drive Chevy coupe, Camaro, Chevelle, or otherwise. While development of a new Zeta platform was scaled back months ago, the decision to pull the plug on these new cars is much more recent. The only sub-Cadillac/ Corvette rear-drive program going forth (beside Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky) is the next-gen GTO, expected for the 2008 model year.

    GM sources say the Holden's Zeta rear-drive platforms aren't considered refined enough for rear-drive Buicks and Chevys to compete with the Mercedes-based Chrysler and Dodge LX models or any other modern competitor. Cadillac's Sigma platform, meanwhile, is too expensive for GM's mainstream brands.

    Meanwhile, GM is yet again reorganizing its divisions. Cadillac, Hummer, and Saab continue as the company's premium troika (it considers Saab near-luxury). Even though Hummer H2 sales plunged after its first year, with the new H3 and more product on the way, the division is designed to thrive with relatively low volume. Saturn continues as a warm-and-fuzzy Toyota, Honda/Acura competitor as it moves upmarket.

    GM plans to morph as many as possible of its individual Pontiac, Buick, and GMC dealers into three-brand combos. A Pontiac-Buick-GMC dealer doesn't have to be full-line, like Chevrolet, says marketing chief Mark LaNeve. The plan is to shape GM into eight "tightly focused" brands. "If those brands aren't focused, you don't need them," LaNeve adds.

    But the reality looks set to fall short of the rhetoric. GMC, for example, is relying on its expanding Denali line, which is really just a trim level, to distinguish itself from Chevy trucks. And while Pontiac builds a largely front-drive performance lineup and Buick builds a front-drive (except for the Rainier) "quiet luxury" lineup, there's still loads of overlap. Yes, a 3.5-liter high-feature Buick LaCrosse is much different from a small-block V-8 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP. But the high-volume sub-$25,000 LaCrosses and Grand Prixs are distinguished by little more than sheetmetal and interior design.

    All of which leads to the question: If Chrysler Group can manage to build affordable, gotta-have rear-drive Chrysler 300s, Dodge Magnums, and Chargers with optional V-8s, why can't the world's largest automaker compete?
    Colin
    92 Sunbird GT, 3200 Hybrid 13.99@ 95.22 (2004)
    90 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 10.54 @ 129mph.

  • #2
    Well, I believe it is time for GM to be a little bit more competetive. They are starting to get a bad name, same as Chrysler did in the 70s and 80s. Maybe a complete makeover is in order? With Delphi going belly up, the public is starting to get edgy about GM. Maybe they should stop paying employees $30/hr., to put a nut on a bolt. Turn some of that revenue into R&D. You have to admit, not much new has come from GM lately. The Cobalt, and some copies of other works, the Vette/Ferrari is an example. Bring back the Camaro, Cutlass and some other goodies. How about a rebirth of the LQ1 tied to a tough little 6 speed auto? Then maybe it would see the mythical 275 hp. I'd like to see this combo in a RWD! (Turbocharged of course!)
    If you are driving a Chevy, everything else, is just a blur. 3.4 Carbon Footprint.
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      LQ1 come on mand. The 2.8L and 3.6L demolishes that old battle axe.

      GM has to drop this FWD SHIT. What the hell is a smallblock doing driving the front wheels. GM should have had the entire W body lineup RWD 4 or 5 years ago. They said they were going to do it by 07 but im begining to wonder. Everything bigger than the Malibu should be RWD/AWD

      The Grand Prix is one of the best damn lookng cars on the road. If they made it RWD/AWD with the 5.3L people who are buying the Magnums and 300C would have better options. One that got good gas milage too.
      1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
      1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
      Because... I am, CANADIAN

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by betterthanyou
        LQ1 come on man. The 2.8L and 3.6L demolishes that old battle axe.
        He called the LQ1 a battle axe.... You Bad, BAD, man! But....opinions vary. :P
        If you are driving a Chevy, everything else, is just a blur. 3.4 Carbon Footprint.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          GM needs to take a lesson from Sony.

          "The public does not know what is possible, we do."

          They're too afraid to take chances.
          I wish I still had my sixty degree.
          Subwoofer Tools

          Comment


          • #6
            Lots of rumors floating around that GM will be bankrupt in less than 5 years.

            Lyle

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Lyle's GTP
              Lots of rumors floating around that GM will be bankrupt in less than 5 years.

              Lyle
              GM has probabally known that for 10 years. Why do you think they are restructuring.

              Soon ALL cars except the Vette will be designed by one team over seas. One team will design a car for each division on one platform. This will save enormous amonts of money and will also result it a better designed cars. Only the Vette and Trucks will be designed and built here.
              1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
              1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
              Because... I am, CANADIAN

              Comment


              • #8
                We all hope you are right.

                Lyle

                Comment

                Working...
                X