there is a custom twin turbo ecotec that is rated at like 750 hp
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TT 3.2L DOHC at Sema.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
What's really impressive is that they're using factory block and head castings.
At that power level, the crank would be billet, and the pistons and rods are obviously aftermarket.
But using production block and head castings at that power level is astounding, for both the V6 and the 4 cyl.
Production GN blocks won't go that high.
Production Chevy blocks won't go that high.Current:
\'87 Fiero GT: 12.86@106 - too dam many valves; ran 12.94 @ 112 on new engine, then broke a CV joint
\'88 Fiero Formula: slow and attention getting; LZ8 followed by LLT power forthcoming
\'88 BMW 325iX: The penultimate driving machine awaiting a heart transplant
Gone, mostly forgotten:
\'90 Pontiac 6000 SE AWD: slow but invisible
Comment
-
Read Here
The final race engine was eventually debored and destroked to meet the category rules. Two big twin turbos were added along with a modified upper intake, but the competition engine still maintained its production lower intake, fuel rail and head castings. Although a small liner was pressed into the block to meet the class rules of a 3.5L engine, the block casting, cylinder head castings, and crankshaft all remained production components.1993 EXT. CAB, 3.4L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. Sonoma
1990 4Door, 3.2L V6 TBI, 5spd manual. 4X4. Trooper
Because... I am, CANADIAN
Comment
-
Wow...-Brad-
89 Mustang : Future 60V6 Power
sigpic
Follow the build -> http://www.3x00swap.com/index.php?page=mustang-blog
Comment
-
Originally posted by betterthanyouRead Here
The final race engine was eventually debored and destroked to meet the category rules. Two big twin turbos were added along with a modified upper intake, but the competition engine still maintained its production lower intake, fuel rail and head castings. Although a small liner was pressed into the block to meet the class rules of a 3.5L engine, the block casting, cylinder head castings, and crankshaft all remained production components.
So is this officailly the fastest J body in history?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DarkKnightOriginally posted by betterthanyouRead Here
The final race engine was eventually debored and destroked to meet the category rules. Two big twin turbos were added along with a modified upper intake, but the competition engine still maintained its production lower intake, fuel rail and head castings. Although a small liner was pressed into the block to meet the class rules of a 3.5L engine, the block casting, cylinder head castings, and crankshaft all remained production components.
So is this officailly the fastest J body in history?
as much as i agree, yes our cranks for what we put them through are up to the task... i think we would see failure on any of these Gen powerplants at that level of severity :P
*Note- I say Gen1.5 as in its a Gen1 but the 86+ GEN1's that recieved the larger Main Journal Crankshaft, (as we all know early early gen1's all snapped the weak small diameter main journal cranks at the Mains like they were going out of style... to which they did LOL)Colin
92 Sunbird GT, 3200 Hybrid 13.99@ 95.22 (2004)
90 Eagle Talon TSi AWD 10.54 @ 129mph.
Comment
Comment