Tweet
"These numbers are equal to roughly 284hp and 244 ft-lbs at the crank, so we increased the power output by ~109 horsepower!! " (using 20% drivetrain los from a chassis dyno and comparing to GM qoted crank hp numbers).
"They are the best heads on the market, bar-none." (no comparisons to anything else)
"Then again, when you have a .600"+ lift cam and a ton of duration, how often are you really below .450" lift anyways? " (how can you tell when you don't have cam specs)
"I don't see the lower intake as being a restriction. So it( the intake port on the head) would probably flow the same amount." (ROFL! seriously, you can't get more incorrect)
"Correct, much much more power over a set of stock 3500 heads" (no comparisons made, just talking again)
"but the numbers he had were going through a 5 speed trans before they got to the wheels, so efficiency was probably more like 90% instead of 80%." (where does he come up with these numbers?)
"They are the best heads on the market, bar-none." (no comparisons to anything else)
"Then again, when you have a .600"+ lift cam and a ton of duration, how often are you really below .450" lift anyways? " (how can you tell when you don't have cam specs)
"I don't see the lower intake as being a restriction. So it( the intake port on the head) would probably flow the same amount." (ROFL! seriously, you can't get more incorrect)
"Correct, much much more power over a set of stock 3500 heads" (no comparisons made, just talking again)
"but the numbers he had were going through a 5 speed trans before they got to the wheels, so efficiency was probably more like 90% instead of 80%." (where does he come up with these numbers?)
Comment