Tweet
is it possible to perform what most early stangers do...replace their ECU and add a mass air sensor to convert from speed density to MAF? What about the splitsec.com Universal MAF conversion kit? Would their be any benefit in converting?
-
\"Pree\" - 93 Grand Prix SE - 3.4L Twin Dual Cam
- FFP UD Pulley - FFP Chip - 8mm Taylor Wires
- 160* T/stat - Dual 40 Series Flowmasters
- Hi-Flo Cat
15.2@95mph - GTECH P/B
http://home.rgv.rr.com/tjperformance/Cap0005.mpg -
It would be easiest to get a 94+ wire harness and all the things to go with it. I believe you have to change A LOT though. Crank sensor, cam covers, etc. -
need to change front cover w/ balancer, front cam carrier and intake cam, wiring harness to use the 94+ harness.
what is this MAF conversion kit? any link?Comment
-
Whats the advantage? Just curiousAdam
PS, the proper pronunciation is FIIIEEERRRROOOOOOoooooo my GOOODDDD!!!!!
Comment
-
Along with a 94 alternator, 24x crank sensor, cam sensor, crank pulley, 4 wire o2 sensor. there are a few others i can't remember.Originally posted by patgizz
advantages: since it measures and uses airflow directly, it responds to mods. MAP you have to constantly fiddle with it every time you change something since it uses the MAP and VE (tunable part) to calculate airflow..
disavantages: expensive MAF sensor that goes out much more often then a MAP. MAF placement becomes a pain in come cases, a restriction in others. The only thing that will throw MAF tuning off is outflowing the MAF, or changing any piping 12" on either side of the MAF. An air filter directly on the MAF is not a wise idea.Comment
Comment